Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32334508›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2020

A single-model quality assessment method for poor quality protein structure.

Jianquan Ouyang, Ningqiao Huang, Yunqi Jiang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jianquan Ouyangkey Laboratory of Intelligent Computing & Information Processing, Ministry of Education, Xiangtan University, Xiangtan, China. 27894827@qq.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7518-5156
Ningqiao Huangkey Laboratory of Intelligent Computing & Information Processing, Ministry of Education, Xiangtan University, Xiangtan, China.
Yunqi JiangCollege of Chemistry, Xiangtan University, Xiangtan, China.

Funding

Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China 2018AAA0102301
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundQuality assessment of protein tertiary structure prediction models, in which structures of the best quality are selected from decoys, is a major challenge in protein structure prediction, and is crucial to determine a model's utility and potential applications. Estimating the quality of a single model predicts the model's quality based on the single model itself. In general, the Pearson correlation value of the quality assessment method increases in tandem with an increase in the quality of the model pool. However, there is no consensus regarding the best method to select a few good models from the poor quality model pool.

resultsWe introduce a novel single-model quality assessment method for poor quality models that uses simple linear combinations of six features. We perform weighted search and linear regression on a large dataset of models from the 12th Critical Assessment of Protein Structure Prediction (CASP12) and benchmark the results on CASP13 models. We demonstrate that our method achieves outstanding performance on poor quality models.

conclusionsAccording to results of poor protein structure assessment based on six features, contact prediction and relying on fewer prediction features can improve selection accuracy.

Indexed as

Models, MolecularComputational BiologyProtein ConformationProteinsProteinsLinear combinationPoor quality protein structuralProtein model quality assessmentProtein structure ranking

Identifiers

PMID32334508
PMCPMC7183596

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.