Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32334116›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases2020

Self-assessment of the Thai Department of Disease Control's communication for international response to COVID-19 in the early phase.

Soawapak Hinjoy, Royce Tsukayama, Teerasak Chuxnum, Wattana Masunglong, Chitphanu Sidet, Pitchapa Kleeblumjeak, Napatsawan Onsai, Sopon Iamsirithaworn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The Effect of Local and Global Interventions on Epidemic Spreading.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Roadblocks and COVID-19: Hope and Strict Control.Disaster medicine and public health preparedness · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Soawapak HinjoyOffice of International Cooperation, Department of Disease Control, Ministry of Public Health, Thailand.
Royce TsukayamaOffice of International Cooperation, Department of Disease Control, Ministry of Public Health, Thailand.
Teerasak ChuxnumDivision of Epidemiology, Department of Disease Control, Ministry of Public Health, Thailand.
Wattana MasunglongOffice of International Cooperation, Department of Disease Control, Ministry of Public Health, Thailand.
Chitphanu SidetOffice of International Cooperation, Department of Disease Control, Ministry of Public Health, Thailand.
Pitchapa KleeblumjeakOffice of International Cooperation, Department of Disease Control, Ministry of Public Health, Thailand.
Napatsawan OnsaiOffice of International Cooperation, Department of Disease Control, Ministry of Public Health, Thailand.
Sopon IamsirithawornDivision of Communicable diseases, Department of Disease Control, Ministry of Public Health, Thailand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study aimed to assess the Thailand Department of Disease Control's (DDC) early responses to COVID-19 in respect to communication with the international community and to identify the manner of Thailand's response during public health emergencies.

methodsDocuments and international response communication from 4-31 January 2020 were reviewed and dates of responses were collected for descriptive analysis. A questionnaire was submitted to the DDC officers responsible for international coordination. A meeting to identify responses was held to evaluate the self-assessed capacities of the Department's international communication.

resultsThailand began the COVID-19 screening protocol on 3 January 2020. International correspondence subsequently occurred continually either through the ASEAN or International Health Regulations (IHR) mechanisms. The total score of communication for international response was 88.9%. For IHR reporting duties, the median duration to respond was 2.49hours. Official news was sent within a mean of 9.18hours and the English daily situation reports were always uploaded onto the official website within 24hours.

conclusionsThis study provided a benchmark for international coordination and communication capacities and also identified areas for improvement during public health emergencies, such as the need to identify English-speaking spokespeople to communicate at an international level.

Indexed as

BetacoronavirusAgedCommunicable Disease ControlCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19FemaleHumansInternational Health RegulationsPandemicsPneumonia, ViralPublic HealthSARS-CoV-2Self-AssessmentThailandCOVID-19International communicationMechanismsThailand

Identifiers

PMID32334116
PMCPMC7194559

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.