Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32333897›Full record

Trial reportThe Lancet. Neurology2020

Safety and efficacy of tocilizumab versus azathioprine in highly relapsing neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (TANGO): an open-label, multicentre, randomised, phase 2 trial.

Chao Zhang, Meini Zhang, Wei Qiu, Hongshan Ma, Xinghu Zhang, Zilong Zhu, Chun-Sheng Yang, Dongmei Jia, Tian-Xiang Zhang, Meng Yuan and 7 more

Erratum issued 2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Lancet. Neurology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 130 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
130citing papers in PubMed, 9 pooled it
26.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03350633 phase2 / phase3completednot on this map

Safety and Efficacy of Tocilizumab Versus Azathioprine in Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorders: a Randomized, Controlled, Open-label, Phase 2 Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorTianjin Medical University General HospitalRan2017 to 2019Enrolled118ConditionsNeuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorders, Neuromyelitis OpticaArmsTocilizumab Injection, Azathioprine
NCT05414890 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Comparison of the Specificity, Sensitivity, and Clinical Correlation of Cell-based Assay (CBA) and CBA-TSA (Tyramide Signal Amplification) in Detecting AQP4, MOG, and NMDAR-IgG in Central Nervous System Diseases; a National Multicenter Study

TypeobservationalSponsorBeijing Tiantan HospitalRan2022 to 2024Enrolled2,500ConditionsNMO Spectrum Disorder, NMDA-R Encephalitis, Diagnostic Self Evaluation, Immune System DiseasesArmsCBA-TSA
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

130 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 263 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

70 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Chao ZhangDepartment of Neurology, Tianjin Neurological Institute, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China; China National Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases, Advanced Innovation Center for Human Brain Protection, Department of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Meini ZhangDepartment of Neurology, First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China.
Wei QiuDepartment of Neurology, Third Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Hongshan MaThe Third People's Hospital of Datong, School of Clinical Medicine, Shanxi Medical University, Datong, China.
Xinghu ZhangChina National Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases, Advanced Innovation Center for Human Brain Protection, Department of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Zilong ZhuDepartment of Neurology, Huanhu Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Chun-Sheng YangDepartment of Neurology, Tianjin Neurological Institute, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China.
Dongmei JiaDepartment of Neurology, Tianjin Neurological Institute, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China.
Tian-Xiang ZhangDepartment of Neurology, Tianjin Neurological Institute, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China.
Meng YuanDepartment of Neurology, Tianjin Neurological Institute, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China.
Yan FengDepartment of Neurology, Tianjin Neurological Institute, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China.
Li YangDepartment of Neurology, Tianjin Neurological Institute, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China.
Wenli LuSchool of Public Health, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China.
Chunshui YuDepartment of Neurology, Tianjin Neurological Institute, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China; School of Radiology, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China.
Jeffrey L BennettDepartments of Neurology and Ophthalmology, Programs in Neuroscience and Immunology, University of Colorado, Denver School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA.
Fu-Dong ShiDepartment of Neurology, Tianjin Neurological Institute, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China; China National Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases, Advanced Innovation Center for Human Brain Protection, Department of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China. Electronic address: fshi@tmu.edu.cn.
TANGO Study Investigators
Tianjin Medical University General Hospital · CNCapital Medical University · CNShanxi Medical University · CNTianjin Medical University · CNThird Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University · CNTianjin Huanhu Hospital · CNUniversity of Colorado Denver · US

Funding

Humoral Immunity, Astrocyte Injury, and Demyelination in Neuromyelitis OpticaR01EY022936 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI BENNETT, JEFFREY L · 2013 to 2022
$3.8M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY022936
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAzathioprine is used as a first-line treatment to prevent relapses of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD). Tocilizumab has been reported to reduce NMOSD disease activity in retrospective case reports. We aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of tocilizumab and azathioprine in patients with highly relapsing NMOSD.

methodsWe did an open-label, multicentre, randomised, phase 2 trial at six hospitals in China. We recruited adult patients (aged ≥18 years) with highly relapsing NMOSD diagnosed according to 2015 International Panel for Neuromyelitis Optica Diagnosis criteria, who had an Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score of 7·5 or lower, and had a history of at least two clinical relapses during the previous 12 months or three relapses during the previous 24 months with at least one relapse within the previous 12 months. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to intravenous tocilizumab (8 mg/kg every 4 weeks) or oral azathioprine (2-3 mg/kg per day) by an independent statistician using computer-generated randomisation software with permuted blocks of four. The central review committee, EDSS raters, laboratory personnel, and radiologists were masked to the treatment assignment, but investigators and patients were aware of treatment allocation. The minimum planned duration of treatment was 60 weeks following randomisation. The primary outcome was time to first relapse in the full analysis set, which included all randomly assigned patients who received at least one dose of study drug, and the per-protocol population, which included all patients who used azathioprine or tocilizumab as monotherapy. For the analyses of the primary outcome, the patients were prespecified into two subgroups according to concomitant autoimmune disease status. Safety was assessed in the full analysis set. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03350633.

findingsBetween Nov 1, 2017, and Aug 3, 2018, we enrolled 118 patients, of whom 59 were randomly assigned to tocilizumab and 59 were randomly assigned to azathioprine. All 118 patients received one dose of study drug and were included in the full analysis set. 108 participants were included in the per-protocol analysis (56 in the tocilizumab group and 52 in the azathioprine group). In the full analysis set, median time to the first relapse was longer in the tocilizumab group than the azathioprine group (78·9 weeks [IQR 58·3-90·6] vs 56·7 [32·9-81·7] weeks; p=0·0026). Eight (14%) of 59 patients in the tocilizumab group and 28 (47%) of 59 patients in the azathioprine group had a relapse at the end of the study (hazard ratio [HR] 0·236 [95% CI 0·107-0·518]; p<0·0001). In the per-protocol analysis, 50 (89%) of 56 patients in the tocilizumab group were relapse-free compared with 29 (56%) of 52 patients in the azathioprine group at the end of the study (HR 0·188 [95% CI 0·076-0·463]; p<0·0001); the median time to first relapse was also longer in the tocilizumab group than the azathioprine group (67·2 weeks [IQR 47·9-77·9] vs 38·0 [23·6-64·9]; p<0·0001). In the prespecified subgroup analysis of the full analysis set stratified by concomitant autoimmune diseases, among patients without concomitant autoimmune diseases, three (9%) of 34 patients in the tocilizumab group and 13 (35%) of 37 patients in the azathioprine group had relapsed by the end of the study. Among patients with concomitant autoimmune diseases, a lower proportion of patients in the tocilizumab group had a relapse than in the azathioprine group (five [20%] of 25 patients vs 15 [68%] of 22 patients; HR 0·192 [95% CI 0·070-0·531]; p=0·0004). 57 (97%) of 59 patients in the tocilizumab group and 56 (95%) of 59 patients in the azathioprine group had adverse events. Treatment-associated adverse events occurred in 36 (61%) of 59 tocilizumab-treated patients and 49 (83%) of 59 azathioprine-treated patients. One death (2%) occurred in the tocilizumab group and one (2%) in the azathioprine group, but neither of the deaths were treatment-related.

interpretationTocilizumab significantly reduced the risk of a subsequent NMOSD relapse compared with azathioprine. Tocilizumab might therefore be another safe and effective treatment to prevent relapses in patients with NMOSD.

fundingTianjin Medical University, Advanced Innovation Center for Human Brain Protection, National Key Research and Development Program of China, National Science Foundation of China.

Indexed as

AdultAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAzathioprineFemaleHumansImmunosuppressive AgentsMaleMiddle AgedNeuromyelitis OpticaTreatment OutcomeAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAzathioprineImmunosuppressive Agentstocilizumab

Identifiers

PMID32333897
PMCPMC7935423
OpenAlexW3019956952

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.