ArticleSystematic biology2020
Adaptive Estimation for Epidemic Renewal and Phylogenetic Skyline Models.
Article in Systematic biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Key questions for modelling COVID-19 exit strategies.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2020Pooled it
- Asymmetric limits on timely interventions from noisy epidemic data.Communications physics · 2025Article
- Risk averse reproduction numbers improve resurgence detection.PLoS computational biology · 2023Article
- Model design for nonparametric phylodynamic inference and applications to pathogen surveillance.Virus evolution · 2023Article
- Real-time estimation of the epidemic reproduction number: Scoping review of the applications and challenges.PLOS digital health · 2022Article
- Fundamental limits on inferring epidemic resurgence in real time using effective reproduction numbers.PLoS computational biology · 2022Article
- A computationally tractable birth-death model that combines phylogenetic and epidemiological data.PLoS computational biology · 2022Article
- Are Skyline Plot-Based Demographic Estimates Overly Dependent on Smoothing Prior Assumptions?Systematic biology · 2021Article
- Deciphering early-warning signals of SARS-CoV-2 elimination and resurgence from limited data at multiple scales.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2021Article
- Improved estimation of time-varying reproduction numbers at low case incidence and between epidemic waves.PLoS computational biology · 2021Article
- Sub-spreading events limit the reliable elimination of heterogeneous epidemics.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2021Article
- Stairway Plot 2: demographic history inference with folded SNP frequency spectra.Genome biology · 2020Article
- An exact method for quantifying the reliability of end-of-epidemic declarations in real time.PLoS computational biology · 2020Article
- Using information theory to optimise epidemic models for real-time prediction and estimation.PLoS computational biology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Estimating temporal changes in a target population from phylogenetic or count data is an important problem in ecology and epidemiology. Reliable estimates can provide key insights into the climatic and biological drivers influencing the diversity or structure of that population and evidence hypotheses concerning its future growth or decline. In infectious disease applications, the individuals infected across an epidemic form the target population. The renewal model estimates the effective reproduction number, R, of the epidemic from counts of observed incident cases. The skyline model infers the effective population size, N, underlying a phylogeny of sequences sampled from that epidemic. Practically, R measures ongoing epidemic growth while N informs on historical caseload. While both models solve distinct problems, the reliability of their estimates depends on p-dimensional piecewise-constant functions. If p is misspecified, the model might underfit significant changes or overfit noise and promote a spurious understanding of the epidemic, which might misguide intervention policies or misinform forecasts. Surprisingly, no transparent yet principled approach for optimizing p exists. Usually, p is heuristically set, or obscurely controlled via complex algorithms. We present a computable and interpretable p-selection method based on the minimum description length (MDL) formalism of information theory. Unlike many standard model selection techniques, MDL accounts for the additional statistical complexity induced by how parameters interact. As a result, our method optimizes p so that R and N estimates properly and meaningfully adapt to available data. It also outperforms comparable Akaike and Bayesian information criteria on several classification problems, given minimal knowledge of the parameter space, and exposes statistical similarities among renewal, skyline, and other models in biology. Rigorous and interpretable model selection is necessary if trustworthy and justifiable conclusions are to be drawn from piecewise models. [Coalescent processes; epidemiology; information theory; model selection; phylodynamics; renewal models; skyline plots].
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.