ArticleJournal of the National Cancer Institute2020
Personalized Cancer Follow-Up Care Pathways: A Delphi Consensus of Research Priorities.
Article in Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Patient-reported duplication and missed breast cancer survivorship care more than 5 years after initial treatment.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2026Article
- Nurse-Directed coordination of cancer survivorship care in a tribal primary care clinic.BMC primary care · 2025Article
- Cardio-oncology rehabilitation and exercise: evidence, priorities, and research standards from the ICOS-CORE working group.European heart journal · 2025Review
- Impact of radiological follow-up frequency on resected lung cancer: a propensity score matching analysis.Journal of thoracic disease · 2024Article
- Survivorship care in breast cancer: understanding implementation barriers through the lens of the Theoretical Domains Framework.JNCI cancer spectrum · 2024Article
- Implementing a PROACTive Care Pathway to Empower and Support Survivors of Breast Cancer.JCO oncology practice · 2023Article
- Defining research and infrastructure priorities for cancer survivorship in Australia: a modified Delphi study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022Article
- Cancer prevention, risk reduction, and control: opportunities for the next decade of health care delivery research.Translational behavioral medicine · 2021Article
- Cancer survivorship care during COVID-19-perspectives and recommendations from the MASCC survivorship study group.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Development of personalized, stratified follow-up care pathways where care intensity and setting vary with needs could improve cancer survivor outcomes and efficiency of health-care delivery. Advancing such an approach in the United States requires identification and prioritization of the most pressing research and data needed to create and implement personalized care pathway models. Cancer survivorship research and care experts (n = 39) participated in an in-person workshop on this topic in 2018. Using a modified Delphi technique-a structured, validated system for identifying consensus-an expert panel identified critical research questions related to operationalizing personalized, stratified follow-up care pathways for individuals diagnosed with cancer. Consensus for the top priority research questions was achieved iteratively through 3 rounds: item generation, item consolidation, and selection of the final list of priority research questions. From the 28 research questions that were generated, 11 research priority questions were identified. The questions were categorized into 4 priority themes: determining outcome measures for new care pathways, developing and evaluating new care pathways, incentivizing new care pathway delivery, and providing technology and infrastructure to support self-management. Existing data sources to begin answering questions were also identified. Although existing data sources, including cancer registry, electronic medical record, and health insurance claims data, can be enhanced to begin addressing some questions, additional research resources are needed to address these priority questions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.