Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32333757›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2020

When past is not a prologue: Adapting informatics practice during a pandemic.

Thomas G Kannampallil, Randi E Foraker, Albert M Lai, Keith F Woeltje, Philip R O Payne

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Thomas G KannampallilInstitute for Informatics, Washington University School of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Randi E ForakerInstitute for Informatics, Washington University School of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Albert M LaiInstitute for Informatics, Washington University School of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Keith F WoeltjeDepartment of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Philip R O PayneInstitute for Informatics, Washington University School of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Data and information technology are key to every aspect of our response to the current coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic-including the diagnosis of patients and delivery of care, the development of predictive models of disease spread, and the management of personnel and equipment. The increasing engagement of informaticians at the forefront of these efforts has been a fundamental shift, from an academic to an operational role. However, the past history of informatics as a scientific domain and an area of applied practice provides little guidance or prologue for the incredible challenges that we are now tasked with performing. Building on our recent experiences, we present 4 critical lessons learned that have helped shape our scalable, data-driven response to COVID-19. We describe each of these lessons within the context of specific solutions and strategies we applied in addressing the challenges that we faced.

Indexed as

BetacoronavirusElectronic Health RecordsMedical InformaticsPandemicsCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19Datasets as TopicHumansPneumonia, ViralSARS-CoV-2analyticsapplied informaticsCOVID-19lessons learned

Identifiers

PMID32333757
PMCPMC7188126

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.