Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32333527›Full record

Trial reportBJS open2020

Liver transplantation for unresectable colorectal liver metastases in patients and donors with extended criteria (SECA-II arm D study).

T M Smedman, P-D Line, M Hagness, T Syversveen, H Grut, S Dueland

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BJS open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 86 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

T M SmedmanDepartment of Oncology, Oslo, Norway.
P-D LineDepartment of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo, Norway.
M HagnessDepartment of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo, Norway.
T SyversveenRadiology and Nuclear Medicine, Oslo, Norway.
H GrutRadiology and Nuclear Medicine, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-9271-8789
S DuelandDepartment of Oncology, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-6125-6689
University of Oslo · NOOslo University Hospital · NO

Funding

Kreftforeningen 182704South-Eastern Norway Regional Health Authority. 39905
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients with metastatic colorectal cancer receiving palliative chemotherapy have a 5-year survival rate of approximately 10 per cent. Liver transplantation using strict selection criteria in patients with colorectal cancer and unresectable liver-only disease will result in a 5-year survival rate of 56-83 per cent. The aim of this study was to evaluate survival of patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) after liver transplantation using extended criteria for both patients and donors.

methodsThis was a prospective single-arm study. Patients with synchronous unresectable CRLM who were not suitable for arms A, B or C of the SEcondary CAncer (SECA) II study who had undergone radical resection of the primary tumour and received chemotherapy were included; they underwent liver transplantation with extended criteria donor grafts. Patients who had resectable pulmonary metastases were eligible for inclusion. The main exclusion criteria were BMI above 30 kg/m

resultsTen patients (median age 54 years; 3 women) were included. They had an extensive liver tumour load with a median of 20 (range 1-45) lesions; the median size of the largest lesion was 59 (range 15-94) mm. Eight patients had (y)pN2 disease, six had poorly differentiated or signet ring cell-differentiated primary tumours, and five had primary tumour in the ascending colon. The median Fong clinical risk score was 3 (range 2-5) and the median Oslo score was 1 (range 1-4). The median plasma carcinoembryonic antigen level was 4·3 (range 2-4346) μg/l. Median disease-free and overall survival was 4 and 18 months respectively.

conclusionPatients with unresectable liver-only CRLM undergoing liver transplantation with extended patient and donor criteria have relatively short overall survival.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAntineoplastic AgentsBiomarkers, TumorCarcinoembryonic AntigenColorectal NeoplasmsFemaleHumansLiver NeoplasmsLiver TransplantationMaleMiddle AgedNorwayProspective StudiesSurvival AnalysisAntineoplastic AgentsBiomarkers, TumorCarcinoembryonic Antigen

Identifiers

PMID32333527
PMCPMC7260412
OpenAlexW3019287253

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.