ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2020
Environmental factors controlling the dynamics of phytoplankton communities during spring and fall seasons in the southern Sunda Shelf.
Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Highly DiverseFrontiers in microbiology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Phytoplankton play important roles in marine ecosystems and have major impacts on the global biogeochemical cycles, yet the knowledge of the processes for oceanic environments controlling the phytoplankton dynamics still needs to be improved, particularly in the coastal ecosystems. Monitoring diversity of phytoplankton communities, including micro/nano- and pico-forms, as well as their dynamics in relation to environmental factors, is thus of critical significance. Here, we conducted two cruises in the southern Sunda Shelf during spring and fall 2016 to investigate the community structure and dynamics of phytoplankton assemblages in relation to environmental factors combining microscopy and flow cytometry. Micro/nanophytoplankton communities changed from Trichodesmium spp. and diatoms co-dominance in spring to communities dominated by Trichodesmium spp. in fall. Diatoms were a highly diverse group, with 78 species, followed by dinoflagellates (35 species). Differences in average abundance of micro/nanophytoplankton between spring and fall might be attributed to the shift in dominance of Trichodesmium spp. and diatoms. Picophytoplankton characterized by a great abundance of picocyanobacteria were dominated by Synechococcus. The dynamics of picophytoplankton during spring and fall might be associated with the differences in dominant Synechococcus strains. Environmental variables had significant influence on the dynamics of phytoplankton communities, especially nitrate and silicate. Silicate was a major driver responsible for the variations of micro/nanophytoplankton. Low silicate potentially limited the diatom growth during fall, leading to the overwhelming dominance of Trichodesmium spp. Picophytoplankton showed positive correlations with nitrate and silicate, suggesting that these nutrients collectively controlled variations in picophytoplankton communities during spring and fall.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.