Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32333294›Full record

ArticleBreast cancer research and treatment2020

The supplemental value of mammographic screening over breast MRI alone in BRCA2 mutation carriers.

Inge-Marie Obdeijn, Ritse M Mann, Claudette C E Loo, Marc Lobbes, Eleonora M C Voormolen, Carolien H M van Deurzen, Geertruida de Bock, Hereditary Breast Ovarian Cancer Research Group Netherlands (HEBON), Maartje J Hooning

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Diagnostic sensitivity of mammography and magnetic resonance imaging for ductal carcinomaChinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Inge-Marie ObdeijnDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. a.obdeijn@erasmusmc.nl.
Ritse M MannDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Claudette C E LooDepartment of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Marc LobbesDepartment of Medical Imaging, Zuyderland Medical Center, Sittard-Geleen, The Netherlands.
Eleonora M C VoormolenDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Carolien H M van DeurzenDepartment of Pathology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Geertruida de BockDepartment of Epidemiology, University Medical Center, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Hereditary Breast Ovarian Cancer Research Group Netherlands (HEBON)
Maartje J HooningDepartment of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Erasmus MC · NLErasmus MC Cancer Institute · NLLeiden University Medical Center · NLMaastricht University · NLOncode Institute · NLThe Netherlands Cancer Institute · NLUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeBRCA2 mutation carriers are offered annual breast screening with MRI and mammography. The aim of this study was to investigate the supplemental value of mammographic screening over MRI screening alone.

methodsIn this multicenter study, proven BRCA2 mutation carriers, who developed breast cancer during screening using both digital mammography and state-of-art breast MRI, were identified. Clinical data were reviewed to classify cases in screen-detected and interval cancers. Imaging was reviewed to assess the diagnostic value of mammography and MRI, using the Breast Imaging and Data System (BI-RADS) classification allocated at the time of diagnosis.

resultsFrom January 2003 till March 2019, 62 invasive breast cancers and 23 ductal carcinomas in situ were diagnosed in 83 BRCA2 mutation carriers under surveillance. Overall screening sensitivity was 95.2% (81/85). Four interval cancers occurred (4.7% (4/85)). MRI detected 73 of 85 breast cancers (sensitivity 85.8%) and 42 mammography (sensitivity 49.9%) (p < 0.001). Eight mammography-only lesions occurred. In 1 of 17 women younger than 40 years, a 6-mm grade 3 DCIS, retrospectively visible on MRI, was detected with mammography only in a 38-year-old woman. The other 7 mammography-only breast cancers were diagnosed in women aged 50 years and older, increasing sensitivity in this subgroup from 79.5% (35/44) to 95.5% (42/44) (p ≤ 0.001).

conclusionsIn BRCA2 mutation carriers younger than 40 years, the benefit of mammographic screening over MRI was very small. In carriers of 50 years and older, mammographic screening contributed significantly. Hence, we propose to postpone mammographic screening in BRCA2 mutation carriers to at least age 40.

Indexed as

MutationAdultBRCA2 ProteinBreast NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Intraductal, NoninfiltratingEarly Detection of CancerFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHeterozygoteHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMammographyMiddle AgedPrognosisRetrospective StudiesBRCA2 ProteinBRCA2 protein, humanBRCA mutation carriersMammographyMRIScreening

Identifiers

PMID32333294
PMCPMC7220868
OpenAlexW3020492193

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.