Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32333158›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2021

Oncological safety of transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) for rectal cancer: mid-term results of a prospective multicentre study.

Vicente Simo, Patricia Tejedor, Luis Miguel Jimenez, Cristina Hernan, Jaime Zorilla, Jorge Arrredondo, Fernando Lapuente, Carlos Pastor

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Longitudinal follow-up of sexual function after surgery for ultra-low rectal cancers located within 5 cm of the anal verge: A multicentre collaborative study.Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2025
    Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. [Transanal total mesorectal excision-Indications, technique and results].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Vicente SimoDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, University Hospital Leon, Leon, Spain.
Patricia TejedorDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, University Hospital Fundacion Jimenez Diaz, Madrid, Spain.
Luis Miguel JimenezDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, University Hospital Gregorio Marañon, Madrid, Spain.
Cristina HernanDepartment of Epidemiology, University Hospital of Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain.
Jaime ZorillaDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, University Hospital Gregorio Marañon, Madrid, Spain.
Jorge ArrredondoDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, University Hospital Leon, Leon, Spain.
Fernando LapuenteDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, University Clinic of Navarre, Marquesado de Sta, Marta St. #1, 28027, Madrid, Spain.
Carlos PastorDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, University Hospital Fundacion Jimenez Diaz, Madrid, Spain. cpastor@unav.es.
Clinica Universidad de Navarra · ESHospital de León · ESHospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón · ESHospital Universitario Fundación Jiménez Díaz · ESUniversidad de Valladolid · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is no consensus regarding the gold standard technique for rectal cancer as Total Mesorectal Excision (TME) may be safely performed either by open or minimally invasive surgery. The laparoscopic approach, however, may carry technical difficulties. For this reason, a novel technique has emerged in the last decade combining a dual laparoscopic dissection (abdominal and transanal) to perform the TME technique (TaTME). When focusing on oncological outcomes, there is a lack of literature regarding mid-long term results. The aim of this study is to evaluate the mid-term oncological impact of TaTME for treating rectal cancer.

methodsA prospective multicentre study was performed in four tertiary centres including consecutive patients who underwent TaTME for mid-low rectal cancer by the same group of experienced surgeons. The analysed data included pathological results on the quality of TME and mid-term oncological outcomes.

resultsIn total, 173 patients were included throughout a study period of 6 years. Our series included 70% males and 68% of patients with neoadjuvant treatments. The median follow-up was 23 [15-37.5] months. Regarding pathological results, a complete TME was achieved in 72.8%, while circumferential and distal margins were affected in 1.4 and 1.1%, respectively. Five patients developed local recurrences (3%) and 8.1% presented distant disease during the follow-up. The 2-year disease-free survival and the overall survival rates were 88% and 95%, respectively.

conclusionsThere is currently a lack of evidence in the literature regarding TaTME and oncological outcomes with no data available from randomized clinical trials. In the meantime, the reported results from different multicentre series are controversial. This study showed positive mid-term outcomes at 2 years of follow-up and supported notable oncological outcomes with TaTME. However, it must be emphasized that previous experience in minimally invasive and transanal surgeries is essential for surgeons before intending to perform TaTME.

Indexed as

AgedDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleHumansLaparoscopyMaleMargins of ExcisionMiddle AgedNeoadjuvant TherapyNeoplasm StagingPostoperative CareProspective StudiesRectal NeoplasmsTransanal Endoscopic SurgeryTreatment OutcomeLaparoscopic surgeryRectal cancerTaTMETotal mesorectal excisionTransanal total mesorectal excision

Identifiers

PMID32333158
OpenAlexW3019538566

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.