Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32333084›Full record

ReviewCellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS2020

Circulating tumor cells as Trojan Horse for understanding, preventing, and treating cancer: a critical appraisal.

Alexios-Fotios A Mentis, Petros D Grivas, Efthimios Dardiotis, Nicholas A Romas, Athanasios G Papavassiliou

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Alexios-Fotios A MentisPublic Health Laboratories, Hellenic Pasteur Institute, Athens, Greece.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1480-390X
Petros D GrivasDivision of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3965-3394
Efthimios DardiotisDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital of Thessaly, Larissa, Greece.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2957-641X
Nicholas A RomasDepartment of Urology, Columbia University Medical Center, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, USA.
Athanasios G PapavassiliouDepartment of Biological Chemistry, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 75 M. Asias Street-Bldg. 16, 11527, Athens, Greece. papavas@med.uoa.gr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5803-4527
Columbia University Irving Medical Center · USNational and Kapodistrian University of Athens · GRPasteur Hellenic Institute · GRUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) are regarded as harbingers of metastases. Their ability to predict response to therapy, relapse, and resistance to treatment has proposed their value as putative diagnostic and prognostic indicators. CTCs represent one of the zeniths of cancer evolution in terms of cell survival; however, the triggers of CTC generation, the identification of potentially metastatic CTCs, and the mechanisms contributing to their heterogeneity and aggressiveness represent issues not yet fully deciphered. Thus, prior to enabling liquid biopsy applications to reach clinical prime time, understanding how the above mechanistic information can be applied to improve treatment decisions is a key challenge. Here, we provide our perspective on how CTCs can provide mechanistic insights into tumor pathogenesis, as well as on CTC clinical value. In doing so, we aim to (a) describe how CTCs disseminate from the primary tumor, and their link to epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT); (b) trace the route of CTCs through the circulation, focusing on tumor self-seeding and the possibility of tertiary metastasis; (c) describe possible mechanisms underlying the enhanced metastatic potential of CTCs; (d) discuss how CTC could provide further information on the tissue of origin, especially in cancer of unknown primary origin. We also provide a comprehensive review of meta-analyses assessing the prognostic significance of CTCs, to highlight the emerging role of CTCs in clinical oncology. We also explore how cell-free circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analysis, using a combination of genomic and phylogenetic analysis, can offer insights into CTC biology, including our understanding of CTC heterogeneity and tumor evolution. Last, we discuss emerging technologies, such as high-throughput quantitative imaging, radiogenomics, machine learning approaches, and the emerging breath biopsy. These technologies could compliment CTC and ctDNA analyses, and they collectively represent major future steps in cancer detection, monitoring, and management.

Indexed as

Circulating Tumor DNAEpithelial Cell Adhesion MoleculeEpithelial-Mesenchymal TransitionHumansLiquid BiopsyNeoplasm MicrometastasisNeoplasmsNeoplastic Cells, CirculatingPrognosisSecondary PreventionCirculating Tumor DNAEpithelial Cell Adhesion MoleculeCirculating tumor cellCirculating tumor DNADisseminated tumor cellEpithelial–mesenchymal transitionLiquid biopsyRichter's syndromeTumor evolutionTumor self-seeding

Identifiers

PMID32333084
PMCPMC11104835
OpenAlexW3018525942

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.