ArticleNature2020
Chloroquine hype is derailing the search for coronavirus treatments.
Article in Nature, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- An Update on SARS-CoV-2 Clinical Trial Results-What We Can Learn for the Next Pandemic.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- The Fragility of Scientific Rigour and Integrity in "Sped up Science": Research Misconduct, Bias, and Hype and in the COVID-19 Pandemic.Journal of bioethical inquiry · 2023Article
- Review
- Molecular characteristics, immune evasion, and impact of SARS-CoV-2 variants.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2022Review
- Article
- Is rapid scientific publication also high quality? Bibliometric analysis of highly disseminated COVID-19 research papers.Learned publishing : journal of the Association of Learned and Professional Society Publishers · 2021Article
- Adverse Cardiovascular Effects of Anti-COVID-19 Drugs.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2021Review
- Update on COVID-19: A teleconference with the Paediatric Virology Study Group (Review).Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2020Review
- A consideration of convalescent plasma and plasma derivatives in the care of Severely-ill patients with COVID-19.Transfusion and apheresis science : official journal of the World Apheresis Association : official journal of the European Society for Haemapheresis · 2020Review
- No small matter: a perspective on nanotechnology-enabled solutions to fight COVID-19.Nanomedicine (London, England) · 2020Article
- [Ethics and biomedical research during the COVID-19 epidemic: Let's not confuse speed and precipitation!]Annales pharmaceutiques francaises · 2020Article
- Review
- Ethical rationale for better coordination of clinical research on COVID-19.Research ethics · 2020Article
- Studies of Novel Coronavirus Disease 19 (COVID-19) Pandemic: A Global Analysis of Literature.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Review
- SARS-CoV-2 COVID-19 susceptibility and lung inflammatory storm by smoking and vaping.Journal of inflammation (London, England) · 2020Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
- Comment on
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32332911What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.