Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32332741›Full record

ArticleNature communications2020

Endogenous and exogenous control of visuospatial selective attention in freely behaving mice.

Wen-Kai You, Shreesh P Mysore

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Neuronal Features of Visual Attention in the Mouse Superior Colliculus Depend on Learned Behavioral Relevance.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Towards a neuroethological approach to consciousness.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Highly selective visual receptive fields in mouse frontal cortex.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Reward history guides focal attention in whisker somatosensory cortex.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  11. Common and distinct neural mechanisms of attention.Trends in cognitive sciences · 2024
    Review
  12. Costs and benefits of voluntary attention in crows.Royal Society open science · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Exogenous and endogenous spatial attention in crows.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Differential Effects of Endogenous and Exogenous Attention on Sensory Tuning.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Wen-Kai YouThe Solomon H. Snyder Department of Neuroscience, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, 21218, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2085-3038
Shreesh P MysoreThe Solomon H. Snyder Department of Neuroscience, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, 21218, USA. shreesh.mysore@jhu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7781-8252
Johns Hopkins University · US

Funding

Rigourous behavioral paradigms for visuospatial attentionR03HD093995 · NICHD · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI MYSORE, SHREESH P · 2017 to 2018
$164k
NICHD NIH HHS R03 HD093995
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Visuospatial selective attention has been investigated primarily in head-fixed animals and almost exclusively in primates. Here, we develop two human-inspired, discrimination-based behavioral paradigms for studying selective visuospatial attention in freely behaving mice. In the 'spatial probability' task, we find enhanced accuracy, sensitivity, and rate of evidence accumulation at the location with higher probability of target occurrence, and opposite effects at the lower probability location. Together with video-based 3D head-tracking, these results demonstrate endogenous expectation-driven shifts of spatial attention. In the 'flanker' task, we find that a second stimulus presented with the target, but with conflicting information, causes switch-like decrements in accuracy and sensitivity as a function of its contrast, and slower evidence accumulation, demonstrating exogenous capture of spatial attention. The ability to study primate-like selective attention rigorously in unrestrained mice opens a rich avenue for research into neural circuit mechanisms underlying this critical executive function in a naturalistic setting.

Indexed as

AnimalsAttentionBehavior, AnimalBehavior Observation TechniquesCuesExecutive FunctionMaleMiceModels, AnimalSpace PerceptionVisual Perception

Identifiers

PMID32332741
PMCPMC7181831
OpenAlexW3020088214

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.