Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32332731›Full record

ArticleNature communications2020

Direct evidence of boosted oxygen evolution over perovskite by enhanced lattice oxygen participation.

Yangli Pan, Xiaomin Xu, Yijun Zhong, Lei Ge, Yubo Chen, Jean-Pierre Marcel Veder, Daqin Guan, Ryan O'Hayre, Mengran Li, Guoxiong Wang and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 67 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
67citing papers in PubMed
19.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

67 citing papers in PubMed, 667 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. FeAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  7. Oxygen Evolution Reaction Catalysts for Acidic-Media COAdvanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2026
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Unraveling the Role of MoOAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

7 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Yangli Pan *Centre for Future Materials, University of Southern Queensland, Springfield Central, Ipswich, QLD, 4300, Australia.
Xiaomin Xu *WA School of Mines: Minerals, Energy and Chemical Engineering (WASM-MECE), Curtin University, Perth, WA, 6102, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0067-3331
Yijun ZhongWA School of Mines: Minerals, Energy and Chemical Engineering (WASM-MECE), Curtin University, Perth, WA, 6102, Australia.
Lei GeCentre for Future Materials, University of Southern Queensland, Springfield Central, Ipswich, QLD, 4300, Australia. lei.ge@usq.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2989-0329
Yubo ChenSchool of Materials Science and Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, 50 Nanyang Avenue, Singapore, 639798, Singapore.
Jean-Pierre Marcel VederJohn de Laeter Centre, Curtin University, Perth, WA, 6102, Australia.
Daqin GuanState Key Laboratory of Materials-Oriented Chemical Engineering, College of Chemical Engineering, Nanjing Tech University (NanjingTech), Nanjing, 210009, P. R. China.
Ryan O'HayreDepartment of Metallurgical and Materials Engineering, Colorado School of Mines, Golden, CO, 80401, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3762-3052
Mengran LiSchool of Chemical Engineering, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, QLD, 4072, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7858-0533
Guoxiong WangSchool of Chemical Engineering, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, QLD, 4072, Australia.
Hao WangCentre for Future Materials, University of Southern Queensland, Springfield Central, Ipswich, QLD, 4300, Australia.
Wei ZhouState Key Laboratory of Materials-Oriented Chemical Engineering, College of Chemical Engineering, Nanjing Tech University (NanjingTech), Nanjing, 210009, P. R. China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0322-095X
Zongping ShaoWA School of Mines: Minerals, Energy and Chemical Engineering (WASM-MECE), Curtin University, Perth, WA, 6102, Australia. zongping.shao@curtin.edu.au.
Curtin University · AUNanjing Tech University · CNUniversity of Southern Queensland · AUThe University of Queensland · AUColorado School of Mines · USNanyang Technological University · SG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of oxygen evolution reaction (OER) electrocatalysts remains a major challenge that requires significant advances in both mechanistic understanding and material design. Recent studies show that oxygen from the perovskite oxide lattice could participate in the OER via a lattice oxygen-mediated mechanism, providing possibilities for the development of alternative electrocatalysts that could overcome the scaling relations-induced limitations found in conventional catalysts utilizing the adsorbate evolution mechanism. Here we distinguish the extent to which the participation of lattice oxygen can contribute to the OER through the rational design of a model system of silicon-incorporated strontium cobaltite perovskite electrocatalysts with similar surface transition metal properties yet different oxygen diffusion rates. The as-derived silicon-incorporated perovskite exhibits a 12.8-fold increase in oxygen diffusivity, which matches well with the 10-fold improvement of intrinsic OER activity, suggesting that the observed activity increase is dominantly a result of the enhanced lattice oxygen participation.

Identifiers

PMID32332731
PMCPMC7181763
OpenAlexW3020542478

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.