Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32332681›Full record

ArticleMedicine2020

Serum uric acid to creatinine ratio and metabolic syndrome in postmenopausal Chinese women.

Jing Tao, Xin Shen, Jie Li, Erdenbat Cha, Pei-Pei Gu, Jun Liu, Wei Zhu, Lin-Long He, Guo-Qing Li, Zhao Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jing TaoDepartment of Cardiology, People's Hospital of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Urumqi, PR China.
Xin Shen
Jie Li
Erdenbat Cha
Pei-Pei Gu
Jun Liu
Wei Zhu
Lin-Long He
Guo-Qing Li
Zhao Wang

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the association between Serum Uric Acid (UA) to Creatinine (Cr) Ratio (UA/Cr) and metabolic syndrome (MetS) in postmenopausal women.A total of 455 patients with MetS and 457 age- and gender- matched controls were included in the present retrospective study. Serum levels of total cholesterol (TC), triglycerides (TG), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), fasting plasma glucose (FPG), Cr, and UA were measured. We employed logistic regression analysis to investigate the association between serum UA/Cr and MetS in postmenopausal women.Serum UA/Cr levels were significantly higher in patients with MetS than that in control subjects (P < .05). In the correlation analysis, serum UA/Cr showed a significantly positive correlation with age, hypertension, systolic pressure (SBP), diastolic pressure (DBP), Waist, body mass index (BMI), TG, UA and negative correlation with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and Cr (P all < .001). Moreover, multivariate analysis revealed that serum UA/Cr was still an independent risk factor for MetS (OR = 2.928, 95% CI = 2.385-3.596, P < .001) after adjustments for other confounders.Serum UA/Cr are strongly associated with the risk of MetS in postmenopausal Chinese women.

Indexed as

CreatinineMetabolic SyndromeUric AcidAgedBody Mass IndexChinaFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMiddle AgedPostmenopauseRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsWaist CircumferenceCreatinineUric Acid

Identifiers

PMID32332681
PMCPMC7220721

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.