ArticleMedicine2020
Acupuncture for ocular myasthenia gravis: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.
Article in Medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Development of a Computerized Adaptive Test for Quantifying Chinese Medicine Syndrome of Myasthenia Gravis on Basis of Multidimensional Item Response Theory.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2021Article
- Traditional Chinese medicine for myasthenia gravis: Study protocol for a network meta-analysis.Medicine · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe aim of this systematic review with meta-analysis is to determine the efficacy and security of acupuncture in treatment of ocular myasthenia gravis and find out whether or not the quick short-term efficacy of acupuncture exists.
methodsThe following electronic databases will be searched by 2 independent reviewers: PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, Springer, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang, and Chinese Biomedical Literature Database. All randomized controlled trials on acupuncture for ocular myasthenia gravis published in electronic databases from inception to March 1, 2020, with language restricted in Chinese and English will be included in the study.Methodologic quality is assessed by 2 blinded reviewers independently screen and score the articles using the PEDro scale and the Cochrane Collaboration risk of bias tool. A meta-analysis was performed when there is sufficient clinical homogeneity in at least 2 studies. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach is used to rate the body of evidence in each meta-analysis. When the quantitive evaluation is not available, a qualitative description of the results of single study is provided.
resultsAn evidence of variety of acupuncture treatment methods for treating ocular myasthenia gravis will be illustrated using subjective reports and objective measures of performance. The primary outcomes consisted of effective rate, MGFA PIS, QMG, and MG-composite. Secondary outcomes involve clinical absolute and relative score, titers of AchR antibodies, and the side effects. The treatment frequency and courses will be measured.
conclusionThis protocol will present the evidence of whether acupuncture is an effective and safe intervention for ocular myasthenia gravis. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42019141325.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.