SynthesisMedicine2020
Association between polymorphisms of epidermal growth factor 61 and susceptibility of lung cancer: A meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Molecular Marker Discovery and Evaluation: EGF rs1897990 and rs1524106 Variants in a China Lung Adenocarcinoma Young Population.The clinical respiratory journal · 2025Article
- Epidermal Growth Factor (EGF rs4444903) Gene Polymorphism and Risk of HCC in Egyptian HCV Cirrhotic Patients.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2025Article
- RNA splicing: Novel star in pulmonary diseases with a treatment perspective.Acta pharmaceutica Sinica. B · 2025Review
- EGF+61 A>G polymorphism does not predict response to first-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors in lung cancer patients.Thoracic cancer · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To explore the association between epidermal growth factor (EGF) 61A/G polymorphism and lung cancer.All eligible case-control studies published up to August, 2019 were identified by searching PubMed, The excerpta medica database, China Academic Journals Full-text Database, China Biology Medicine, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, China Science and Technology Journal Database, and Wanfang databases. Two researchers independently identified the literature, extracted data, and evaluated quality according to inclusion and exclusion criteria. Meta-analysis was performed by Stata 15.0.A total of 6 studies is included, including 1487 cases and 2044 control subjects. Compared with allele A, allele G was considered to have no association with the risk of lung cancer, odds ratio = 1.07 (95% confidence interval: 0.98-1.15). GG recessive genotype, GG + GA dominant genotype, GG homozygote genotype and GA heterozygote genotype were found out that all of them are not associated with the risk of lung cancer. No association between EGF 61A/G polymorphism and lung cancer was found out by ethnical subgroup analysis. However, in view of the limitations of this study, such as the results of quantitative and sensitivity analysis may be lack of accuracy, so the conclusions of allele model and recessive gene model should be made carefully.It suggested that there was no association between polymorphism of EGF 61A/G and susceptibility of lung cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.