Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32332597›Full record

Observational studyMedicine2020

Subjective expectations for future and mortality among middle-aged and older adults.

Jae Woo Choi, Jae-Hyun Kim, Ki Bong Yoo

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jae Woo ChoiCollege of Pharmacy, Yonsei Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Yonsei University, Incheon.
Jae-Hyun KimDepartment of Health Administration, College of Health Science, Dankook University, Cheonan, South Korea.
Ki Bong YooDepartment of Health Administration, Department of Information & Statistics, Yonsei University, Wonju, Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to categorize various elements for the expectations for the future using factor analysis and identify association between categories of the subjective expectations for the future and mortality among middle-aged and older adults.Data from the Korean Longitudinal Study of Aging from 2006 to 2016 was assessed using longitudinal data analysis and 9,844 research subjects were included at baseline in 2006. Our modeling approach was based on Cox proportional hazards models for mortality.We indicated 3 categories (individual factor, national factor, and combined factor) of 12 subjective expectations for the future using factor analysis. The negative expectations for the future of all factors [individual factor: hazard ratio (HR), 1.65, 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.41-1.93; national factor: HR, 1.20, 95% CI, 1.06-1.37; combined factor: HR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.02-1.32] were more likely to have an increased risk of all-cause mortality than those in the positive expectations for the future. Older adults were more likely to be affected by negative expectations for the future in national factor compared to middle-aged adults (HR, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.05-1.41).Increasing positive expectations for the future is an important consideration for improvement in health. Policy makers need to consider that changes of national policy would affect health in older adults.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsAgingEconomic RecessionFemaleHealth StatusHumansLife ExpectancyLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedMotivationProportional Hazards ModelsQuality of LifeRepublic of Korea

Identifiers

PMID32332597
PMCPMC7220670

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.