Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32332139›Full record

ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2020

Covert Cross-Feeding Revealed by Genome-Wide Analysis of Fitness Determinants in a Synthetic Bacterial Mutualism.

Breah LaSarre, Adam M Deutschbauer, Crystal E Love, James B McKinlay

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. A purine salvage bottleneck leads to bacterial adenine cross-feeding.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. A mutant fitness assay identifies bacterial interactions in a model ocean hot spot.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Extracellular Metabolism Sets the Table for Microbial Cross-Feeding.Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2021
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Microbial genomics · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Breah LaSarreDepartment of Biology, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, USA blasarre@indiana.edu jmckinla@indiana.edu.
Adam M DeutschbauerDepartment of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of California, Berkeley, California, USA.
Crystal E LoveDepartment of Biology, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, USA.
James B McKinlayDepartment of Biology, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, USA blasarre@indiana.edu jmckinla@indiana.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-2401-6229
Indiana University Bloomington · USLawrence Berkeley National Laboratory · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microbial interactions abound in natural ecosystems and shape community structure and function. Substantial attention has been given to cataloging mechanisms by which microbes interact, but there is a limited understanding of the genetic landscapes that promote or hinder microbial interactions. We previously developed a mutualistic coculture pairing

Indexed as

Genetic FitnessCoculture TechniquesEscherichia coliGenome-Wide Association StudyMicrobial InteractionsRhodopseudomonasSymbiosiscoculturecross-feedingEscherichia colifermentationmicrobial ecologynitrogen metabolismpurinesRhodopseudomonassynthetic ecologytransposon sequencing

Identifiers

PMID32332139
PMCPMC7301861
OpenAlexW3018629454

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.