Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32332137›Full record

ReviewApplied and environmental microbiology2020

The Gut Microbiota of Laying Hens and Its Manipulation with Prebiotics and Probiotics To Enhance Gut Health and Food Safety.

Samiullah Khan, Robert J Moore, Dragana Stanley, Kapil K Chousalkar

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 171 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
171citing papers in PubMed
14.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

171 citing papers in PubMed, 356 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Early-Phase Response of Broiler Breeders to 25-Hydroxyvitamin DAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

111 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Samiullah KhanSchool of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Roseworthy, South Australia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0292-2979
Robert J MooreRMIT University, School of Science, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0776-5861
Dragana StanleyCentral Queensland University, Institute for Future Farming Systems, Rockhampton, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7019-4726
Kapil K ChousalkarSchool of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Roseworthy, South Australia, Australia kapil.chousalkar@adelaide.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0002-4134-3996
The University of Adelaide · AUCentral Queensland University · AURMIT University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The microbiota plays a vital role in maintaining gut health and influences the overall performance of chickens. Most gut microbiota-related studies have been performed in broilers, which have different microbial communities compared to those of layers. The normal gut microbiota of laying chickens is dominated by

Indexed as

Food SafetyAnimalsChickensFemaleGastrointestinal MicrobiomePrebioticsProbioticsPrebioticsenteropathogensfeed supplementsgut metabolitesgut microbiotalaying chicken

Identifiers

PMID32332137
PMCPMC7301851
OpenAlexW3020547567

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.