Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32332036›Full record

ArticleBMJ global health2020

Staying afloat: community perspectives on health system resilience in the management of pregnancy and childbirth care during floods in Cambodia.

Dell D Saulnier, Hom Hean, Dawin Thol, Por Ir, Claudia Hanson, Johan Von Schreeb, Helle Mölsted Alvesson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ global health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Exploring Determinants of Community Flood Resilience in Southeast Asia: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Dell D SaulnierDepartment of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden dell.saulnier@ki.se.ORCID 0000-0001-7761-0737
Hom HeanSchool of Public Health, National Institute of Public Health, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
Dawin TholSchool of Public Health, National Institute of Public Health, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
Por IrTechnical Bureau, National Institute of Public Health, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
Claudia HansonDepartment of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-8066-7873
Johan Von SchreebDepartment of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Helle Mölsted AlvessonDepartment of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Karolinska Institutet · SENational Institute of Public Health · KHNational Technical Training Institute · KH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionResilient health systems have the capacity to continue providing health services to meet the community's diverse health needs following floods. This capacity is related to how the community manages its own health needs and the community and health system's joined capacities for resilience. Yet little is known about how community participation influences health systems resilience. The purpose of this study was to understand how community management of pregnancy and childbirth care during floods is contributing to the system's capacity to absorb, adapt or transform as viewed through a framework on health systems resilience.

methodsEight focus group discussions and 17 semi-structured interviews were conducted with community members and leaders who experienced pregnancy or childbirth during recent flooding in rural Cambodia. The data were analysed by thematic analysis and discussed in relation to the resilience framework.

resultsThe theme 'Responsible for the status quo' reflected the community's responsibility to find ways to manage pregnancy and childbirth care, when neither the expectations of the health system nor the available benefits changed during floods. The theme was informed by notions on: i) developmental changes, the unpredictable nature of floods and limited support for managing care, ii) how information promoted by the public health system led to a limited decision-making space for pregnancy and childbirth care, iii) a desire for security during floods that outweighed mistrust in the public health system and iv) the limits to the coping strategies that the community prepared in case of flooding.

conclusionsThe community mainly employed absorptive strategies to manage their care during floods, relieving the burden on the health system, yet restricted support and decision-making may risk their capacity. Further involvement in decision-making for care could help improve the health system's resilience by creating room for the community to adapt and transform when experiencing floods.

Indexed as

FloodsGovernment ProgramsCambodiaFemaleHumansPregnancyPublic HealthRural Populationhealth systemsmaternal healthpublic Healthqualitative study

Identifiers

PMID32332036
PMCPMC7204936
OpenAlexW3019056317

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.