Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32332008›Full record

ReviewBMJ open2020

Dyadic approach to supervised community rehabilitation participation in an Asian setting post-stroke: exploring the role of caregiver and patient characteristics in a prospective cohort study.

Shilpa Tyagi, Gerald Choon-Huat Koh, Nan Luo, Kelvin Bryan Tan, Helen Hoenig, David Bruce Matchar, Joanne Yoong, Angelique Chan, Kim En Lee, Narayanaswamy Venketasubramanian and 18 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Observational
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

28 authors.

Shilpa TyagiSaw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0001-7755-0324
Gerald Choon-Huat KohSaw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore gerald_koh@nuhs.edu.sg.
Nan LuoSaw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
Kelvin Bryan TanPolicy Research and Evaluation Division, Ministry of Health, Singapore.
Helen HoenigPhysical Medicine and Rehabilitation Service, Durham VA Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
David Bruce MatcharInternal Medicine, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Joanne YoongSaw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
Angelique ChanCentre for Ageing Research and Education, Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School, Singapore.
Kim En LeeLee Kim En Neurology Pte Ltd, Singapore.
Narayanaswamy VenketasubramanianRaffles Neuroscience Centre, Raffles Hospital, Singapore.
Edward MenonSt Andrew's Community Hospital, Singapore.
Kin Ming ChanGeriatric Medicine, Mount Alvernia Hospital, Singapore.
Deidre Anne De SilvaNational Neuroscience Institute, Singapore General Hospital Campus, Singapore.
Philip YapGeriatric Centre, Khoo Teck Puat Hospital, Singapore.
Boon Yeow TanSt Luke's Hospital, Singapore.
Effie ChewDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, National University Hospital, Singapore.
Sherry H YoungDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Changi General Hospital, Singapore.
Yee Sien NgDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.
Tian Ming TuDepartment of Neurology, National Neuroscience Institute, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore.
Yan Hoon AngGeriatric Medicine, Khoo Teck Puat Hospital, Singapore.
Keng He KongDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore.
Rajinder SinghDepartment of Neurology, National Neuroscience Institute, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore.
Reshma A MerchantDepartment of Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
Hui Meng ChangNational Neuroscience Institute, Singapore General Hospital Campus, Singapore.
Tseng Tsai YeoDepartment of Neurosurgery, National University Hospital, Singapore.
Chou NingDepartment of Neurosurgery, National University Hospital, Singapore.
Angela CheongSaw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
Chuen Seng TanSaw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo study the association of caregiver factors and stroke survivor factors with supervised community rehabilitation (SCR) participation over the first 3 months and subsequent 3 to 12 months post-stroke in an Asian setting.

designProspective cohort study.

settingCommunity setting.

participantsWe recruited stroke survivors and their caregivers into our yearlong cohort. Caregiver and stroke survivor variables were collected over 3-monthly intervals. We performed logistic regression with the outcome variable being SCR participation post-stroke. OUTCOME MEASURES: SCR participation over the first 3 months and subsequent 3 to 12 months post-stroke

results251 stroke survivor-caregiver dyads were available for the current analysis. The mean age of caregivers was 50.1 years, with the majority being female, married and co-residing with the stroke survivor. There were 61%, 28%, 4% and 7% of spousal, adult-child, sibling and other caregivers. The odds of SCR participation decreased by about 15% for every unit increase in caregiver-reported stroke survivor's disruptive behaviour score (OR: 0.845; 95% CI: 0.769 to 0.929). For every 1-unit increase in the caregiver's positive management strategy score, the odds of using SCR service increased by about 4% (OR: 1.039; 95% CI: 1.011 to 1.068).

conclusionWe established that SCR participation is jointly determined by both caregiver and stroke survivor factors, with factors varying over the early and late post-stroke period. Our results support the adoption of a dyadic or more inclusive approach for studying the utilisation of community rehabilitation services, giving due consideration to both the stroke survivors and their caregivers. Adopting a stroke survivor-caregiver dyadic approach in practice settings should include promotion of positive care management strategies, comprehensive caregiving training including both physical and behavioural dimensions, active engagement of caregivers in rehabilitation journey and conducting regular caregiver needs assessments in the community.

Indexed as

AftercareCaregiversActivities of Daily LivingAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedPatient DischargeProspective StudiesStrokeStroke Rehabilitationorganisation of health servicespublic healthrehabilitation medicinesocial medicinestroke

Identifiers

PMID32332008
PMCPMC7204848

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.