CORONA-steps for tracheotomy in COVID-19 patients: A staff-safe method for airway management.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

1. A safer and more practical tracheotomy in invasive mechanical ventilated patients with COVID-19: A quality improvement study.Frontiers in surgery · 2022
   Article
2. Controlled apneic tracheostomy in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).JTCVS techniques · 2021
   Article
3. Head and neck oncological ablation and reconstruction in the COVID-19 era - our experience to date.The British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery · 2020
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  CORONA-steps for tracheotomy in COVID-19 patients: A staff-safe method for airway management.2020

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as