Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32331823›Full record

ArticleBiological psychiatry2020

Anxiety and Stress Alter Decision-Making Dynamics and Causal Amygdala-Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex Circuits During Emotion Regulation in Children.

Stacie L Warren, Yuan Zhang, Katherine Duberg, Percy Mistry, Weidong Cai, Shaozheng Qin, Sarah-Nicole Bostan, Aarthi Padmanabhan, Victor G Carrion, Vinod Menon

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biological psychiatry, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. From symptom-based heterogeneity to mechanism-based profiling in youth ADHD: the promise of computational psychiatry.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Stacie L WarrenDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford School of Medicine, Stanford, California; Department of Psychology, Palo Alto University, Palo Alto, California.
Yuan ZhangDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
Katherine DubergDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
Percy MistryDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
Weidong CaiDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
Shaozheng QinDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford School of Medicine, Stanford, California; State Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning, IDG/McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China.
Sarah-Nicole BostanDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
Aarthi PadmanabhanDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
Victor G CarrionDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
Vinod MenonDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford School of Medicine, Stanford, California. Electronic address: menon@stanford.edu.
Stanford Medicine · USMcGovern Institute for Brain Research · USPalo Alto University · US

Funding

Integrative computational models of latent behavioral and neural constructs in children: a longitudinal developmental big-data approachR01MH121069 · NIMH · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI MENON, VINOD · 2019 to 2023
$3.9M
Methods for Dynamic Causal Interactions in Human Brain Function and DysfunctionR01NS086085 · NINDS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI MENON, VINOD · 2014 to 2025
$3.9M
Computational modeling of dynamic causal brain circuits underlying cognitive dysfunction in Alzheimer's diseaseRF1NS086085 · NINDS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI MENON, VINOD · 2021 to 2021
$2.0M
Novel Bayesian linear dynamical systems-based methods for discovering human brain circuit dynamics in health and diseaseR01EB022907 · NIBIB · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI MENON, VINOD · 2016 to 2018
$1.6M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB022907NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH121069NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS086085NINDS NIH HHS RF1 NS086085
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAnxiety and stress reactivity are risk factors for the development of affective disorders. However, the behavioral and neurocircuit mechanisms that potentiate maladaptive emotion regulation are poorly understood. Neuroimaging studies have implicated the amygdala and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) in emotion regulation, but how anxiety and stress alter their context-specific causal circuit interactions is not known. Here, we use computational modeling to inform affective pathophysiology, etiology, and neurocircuit targets for early intervention.

methodsForty-five children (10-11 years of age; 25 boys) reappraised aversive stimuli during functional magnetic resonance imaging scanning. Clinical measures of anxiety and stress were acquired for each child. Drift-diffusion modeling of behavioral data and causal circuit analysis of functional magnetic resonance imaging data, with a National Institute of Mental Health Research Domain Criteria approach, were used to characterize latent behavioral and neurocircuit decision-making dynamics driving emotion regulation.

resultsChildren successfully reappraised negative responses to aversive stimuli. Drift-diffusion modeling revealed that emotion regulation was characterized by increased initial bias toward positive reactivity during viewing of aversive stimuli and increased drift rate, which captured evidence accumulation during emotion evaluation. Crucially, anxiety and stress reactivity impaired latent behavioral dynamics associated with reappraisal and decision making. Anxiety and stress increased dynamic casual influences from the right amygdala to DLPFC. In contrast, DLPFC, but not amygdala, reactivity was correlated with evidence accumulation and decision making during emotion reappraisal.

conclusionsOur findings provide new insights into how anxiety and stress in children impact decision making and amygdala-DLPFC signaling during emotion regulation, and uncover latent behavioral and neurocircuit mechanisms of early risk for psychopathology.

Indexed as

Emotional RegulationAdultAmygdalaAnxietyBrain MappingChildEmotionsHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMalePrefrontal CortexAnxietyCausal amygdala-DLPFC circuitsChildrenDecision-making dynamicsEmotion regulationStress

Identifiers

PMID32331823
PMCPMC7442664
OpenAlexW3009018561

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.