Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32331492›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of health policy and management2020

Defining the Benefit Package of Thailand Universal Coverage Scheme: From Pragmatism to Sophistication.

Viroj Tangcharoensathien, Walaiporn Patcharanarumol, Waraporn Suwanwela, Somruethai Supangul, Warisa Panichkriangkrai, Hathairat Kosiyaporn, Woranan Witthayapipopsakul

Abstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of health policy and management, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. A situational and stakeholder analysis of health technology assessment in Zimbabwe.International journal of technology assessment in health care · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Viroj TangcharoensathienInternational Health Policy Program, Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0003-3235-0091
Walaiporn PatcharanarumolInternational Health Policy Program, Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0003-1798-8767
Waraporn SuwanwelaNational Health Security Office, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0003-3217-8172
Somruethai SupangulNational Health Security Office, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0001-9888-9722
Warisa PanichkriangkraiInternational Health Policy Program, Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0003-3567-3128
Hathairat KosiyapornInternational Health Policy Program, Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-7203-8089
Woranan WitthayapipopsakulInternational Health Policy Program, Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0003-1817-8264

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Benefit package is crucial for implementing universal health coverage (UHC). This editorial analyses how the benefit package of the Thai Universal Coverage Scheme (UC Scheme) evolved from an implicit comprehensive package which covered all conditions and interventions (with a few exceptions), to additional explicit positive lists. In 2002 when the Thai UC Scheme was launched; the comprehensive benefit package, including medicines in the national essential list of medicines, formerly offered by the previous schemes were pragmatically adopted. Later, when capacities of producing evidence on health technology assessment (HTA) increased, rigorous assessment of cost effectiveness is mandatorily required for inclusion of new interventions into the Thai UC Scheme benefit package. This contributed to evidence-informed policy decisions. To prevent emptied promises, whichever policy choices are made about the benefit package, either using a negative or a positive list, developing country governments need to make quality health services available and accessible by the entire population. Political decision on benefit package should be informed by evidence on cost effectiveness, equity dimension and health system capacity to deliver equitable services. Low- and middle-income countries need to strengthen HTA capacity to generate evidence and inform policies.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CareUniversal Health InsuranceHealth ServicesHumansTechnology Assessment, BiomedicalThailandEssential Medicines ListHealth Benefit PackageHealth InsuranceThailandUniversal Health Coverage

Identifiers

PMID32331492
PMCPMC7182149

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.