Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32331345›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2020

Organizational Health Literacy in Facilities for People with Disabilities: First Results of an Explorative Qualitative and Quantitative Study.

Katharina Rathmann, Theres Vockert, Lorena Denise Wetzel, Judith Lutz, Kevin Dadaczynski

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Katharina RathmannDepartment of Nursing and Health Sciences, Fulda University of Applied Sciences, 36037 Fulda, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2892-1624
Theres VockertDepartment of Nursing and Health Sciences, Fulda University of Applied Sciences, 36037 Fulda, Germany.
Lorena Denise WetzelDepartment of Nursing and Health Sciences, Fulda University of Applied Sciences, 36037 Fulda, Germany.
Judith LutzDepartment of Nursing and Health Sciences, Fulda University of Applied Sciences, 36037 Fulda, Germany.
Kevin DadaczynskiDepartment of Nursing and Health Sciences, Fulda University of Applied Sciences, 36037 Fulda, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7367-5362
Fulda University of Applied Sciences · DELeuphana University of Lüneburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To date, studies on individual and organizational health literacy (OHL) in facilities for people with disabilities are scarce. Thus, the aims of this study are (1) to adapt an existing instrument for measuring organizational health literacy (OHL), namely, the "Health literate health care organization scale" (HLHO-10), to the context of facilities for people with disabilities, (2) to quantitatively examine characteristics of OHL, and (3) to qualitatively assess the definition and role of OHL by interviewing managers and skilled staff. An online study in Germany with

Indexed as

Health LiteracyPersons with DisabilitiesAdolescentAdultDelivery of Health CareFemaleGermanyHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adulthealth care organizationsinclusionorganizational health literacypeople with disabilities

Identifiers

PMID32331345
PMCPMC7215484
OpenAlexW3020650274

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.