Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32331257›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2020

Long Tandem Arrays of

Ruslan Kalendar, Olga Raskina, Alexander Belyayev, Alan H Schulman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Biology · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. qPCR as a Selective Tool for Cytogenetics.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. The Chromosome Number and rDNA Loci Evolution inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Molecular and Cytogenetic Analysis of rDNA Evolution in Crepis Sensu Lato.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ruslan KalendarDepartment of Agricultural Sciences, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 27 (Latokartanonkaari 5), FI-00014 Helsinki, Finland.
Olga RaskinaInstitute of Evolution, University of Haifa, Mount Carmel, Haifa 31905, Israel.
Alexander BelyayevLaboratory of Molecular Cytogenetics and Karyology, Institute of Botany of the ASCR, Zámek 1, CZ-252 43 Průhonice, Czech Republic.
Alan H SchulmanNatural Resources Institute Finland (Luke), Latokartanonkaari 9, FI-00790 Helsinki, Finland.

Funding

Ministry of Education and Science of the Republic of Kazakhstan BR05236574
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Retrotransposable elements are widely distributed and diverse in eukaryotes. Their copy number increases through reverse-transcription-mediated propagation, while they can be lost through recombinational processes, generating genomic rearrangements. We previously identified extensive structurally uniform retrotransposon groups in which no member contains the

Indexed as

RetroelementsTerminal Repeat SequencesAnimalsChromosomes, InsectEvolution, MolecularGenome, PlantGenomicsHost-Parasite InteractionsMothsNucleic Acid ConformationPhylogenyPlantsRecombination, GeneticRNA, Ribosomal, 5SRetroelementsRNA, Ribosomal, 5S5S RNA geneCassandra TRIMectopic recombinationgenome evolutionlong tandem arrayretrotransposon

Identifiers

PMID32331257
PMCPMC7215508

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.