Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32331244›Full record

ArticleNutrients2020

Dietary Intervention in Pregnant Women with Gestational Diabetes; Protocol for the DiGest Randomised Controlled Trial.

Laura C Kusinski, Helen R Murphy, Emanuella De Lucia Rolfe, Kirsten L Rennie, Linda M Oude Griep, Deborah Hughes, Roy Taylor, Claire L Meek

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Laura C KusinskiInstitute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK.
Helen R MurphyCambridge Universities NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK.
Emanuella De Lucia RolfeNIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre-Diet, Anthropometry and Physical Activity Group, MRC Epidemiology Unit, Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK.
Kirsten L RennieNIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre-Diet, Anthropometry and Physical Activity Group, MRC Epidemiology Unit, Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2690-1934
Linda M Oude GriepNIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre-Diet, Anthropometry and Physical Activity Group, MRC Epidemiology Unit, Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7697-7473
Deborah HughesInstitute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK.
Roy TaylorInstitute of Cellular Medicine, University of Newcastle, Cambridge NE4 5PL, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6273-0170
Claire L MeekInstitute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK.
University of Cambridge · GBNewcastle University · GBUniversity of East Anglia · GB

Funding

Diabetes UK 17/0005712; ISRCTN number 90795724Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) annually affects 35,000 pregnancies in the United Kingdom, causing suboptimal health outcomes to the mother and child. Obesity and excessive gestational weight gain are risk factors for GDM. The Institute of Medicine recommends weight targets for women that are overweight and obese, however, there are no clear guidelines for women with GDM. Observational data suggest that modest weight loss (0.6-2 kg) after 28 weeks may reduce risk of caesarean section, large-for-gestational-age (LGA), and maternal postnatal glycaemia. This protocol for a multicentre randomised double-blind controlled trial aims to identify if a fully controlled reduced energy diet in GDM pregnancy improves infant birthweight and reduces maternal weight gain (primary outcomes). A total of 500 women with GDM (National Institute of Health and Care Excellence (NICE) 2015 criteria) and body mass index (BMI) ≥25 kg/m

Indexed as

Diet, ReducingPregnant PeopleBlood GlucoseCesarean SectionDiabetes, GestationalFemaleGestational Weight GainHumansMulticenter Studies as TopicObesityPregnancyPregnancy ComplicationsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRisk FactorsWeight Reduction ProgramsBlood Glucosecontinuous glucose monitoring (CGM)dietdietary interventiongestational diabeteslarge-for-gestational agematernal obesitymaternal or gestational weight gainneonatal growthneonatal hypoglycaemianeonatal outcomespregnancyrandomised controlled trialstudy protocol

Identifiers

PMID32331244
PMCPMC7230897
OpenAlexW3019087287

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.