Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32330923›Full record

ArticlePhysics in medicine and biology2020

Abdominal synthetic CT generation from MR Dixon images using a U-net trained with 'semi-synthetic' CT data.

Lianli Liu, Adam Johansson, Yue Cao, Janell Dow, Theodore S Lawrence, James M Balter

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physics in medicine and biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Synthetic CT in Carbon Ion Radiotherapy of the Abdominal Site.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Lianli LiuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, United States of America.
Adam JohanssonDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-9849-2143
Yue CaoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, United States of America.
Janell DowDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, United States of America.
Theodore S LawrenceDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, United States of America.
James M BalterDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, United States of America.
University of Michigan · USUppsala University · SE

Funding

Optimizing MRI for Radiation Therapy Treatment PlanningR01EB016079 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI BALTER, JAMES M, CAO, YUE · 2013 to 2022
$3.1M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB016079
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is gaining popularity in guiding radiation treatment for intrahepatic cancers due to its superior soft tissue contrast and potential of monitoring individual motion and liver function. This study investigates a deep learning-based method that generates synthetic CT volumes from T1-weighted MR Dixon images in support of MRI-based intrahepatic radiotherapy treatment planning. Training deep neutral networks for this purpose has been challenged by mismatches between CT and MR images due to motion and different organ filling status. This work proposes to resolve such challenge by generating 'semi-synthetic' CT images from rigidly aligned CT and MR image pairs. Contrasts within skeletal elements of the 'semi-synthetic' CT images were determined from CT images, while contrasts of soft tissue and air volumes were determined from voxel-wise intensity classification results on MR images. The resulting 'semi-synthetic' CT images were paired with their corresponding MR images and used to train a simple U-net model without adversarial components. MR and CT scans of 46 patients were investigated and the proposed method was evaluated for 31 patients with clinical radiotherapy plans, using 3-fold cross validation. The averaged mean absolute errors between synthetic CT and CT images across patients were 24.10 HU for liver, 28.62 HU for spleen, 47.05 HU for kidneys, 29.79 HU for spinal cord, 105.68 HU for lungs and 110.09 HU for vertebral bodies. VMAT and IMRT plans were optimized using CT-derived electron densities, and doses were recalculated using corresponding synthetic CT-derived density grids. Resulting dose differences to planning target volumes and various organs at risk were small, with the average difference less than 0.15 Gy for all dose metrics evaluated. The similarities in both image intensity and radiation dose distributions between CT and synthetic CT volumes demonstrate the accuracy of the method and its potential in supporting MRI-only radiotherapy treatment planning.

Indexed as

AbdomenHumansLiver NeoplasmsMagnetic Resonance ImagingRadiotherapy DosageRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedTomography, X-Ray Computed

Identifiers

PMID32330923
PMCPMC7991979
OpenAlexW3020118654

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.