Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32330223›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2020

scHLAcount: allele-specific HLA expression from single-cell gene expression data.

Charlotte A Darby, Michael J T Stubbington, Patrick J Marks, Álvaro Martínez Barrio, Ian T Fiddes

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Methods and Insights from Single-Cell Expression Quantitative Trait Loci.Annual review of genomics and human genetics · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Mapping the dynamic genetic regulatory architecture ofmedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Charlotte A DarbyDepartment of Computer Science, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA.
Michael J T Stubbington10x Genomics, Pleasanton, CA 94588, USA.
Patrick J Marks10x Genomics, Pleasanton, CA 94588, USA.
Álvaro Martínez Barrio10x Genomics, Pleasanton, CA 94588, USA.
Ian T Fiddes10x Genomics, Pleasanton, CA 94588, USA.
10X Genomics (United States) · USJohns Hopkins University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

summaryBulk RNA sequencing studies have demonstrated that human leukocyte antigen (HLA) genes may be expressed in a cell type-specific and allele-specific fashion. Single-cell gene expression assays have the potential to further resolve these expression patterns, but currently available methods do not perform allele-specific quantification at the molecule level. Here, we present scHLAcount, a post-processing workflow for single-cell RNA-seq data that computes allele-specific molecule counts of the HLA genes based on a personalized reference constructed from the sample's HLA genotypes. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: scHLAcount is available under the MIT license at https://github.com/10XGenomics/scHLAcount. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Indexed as

Single-Cell AnalysisSoftwareAllelesGene ExpressionHumansSequence Analysis, RNAWorkflow

Identifiers

PMID32330223
PMCPMC7320622
OpenAlexW3018397805

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.