Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32330172›Full record

Observational studyPloS one2020

Salivary levels of Streptococcus mutans and Lactobacilli and other salivary indices in patients wearing clear aligners versus fixed orthodontic appliances: An observational study.

Stefano Mummolo, Alessandro Nota, Francesca Albani, Enrico Marchetti, Roberto Gatto, Giuseppe Marzo, Vincenzo Quinzi, Simona Tecco

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 72 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Longitudinal analysis of bite force and strength of orofacial tissues during orthodontic aligner treatment.Journal of orofacial orthopedics = Fortschritte der Kieferorthopadie : Organ/official journal Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Kieferorthopadie · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Stefano MummoloDepartment of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy.
Alessandro NotaDental School, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University and IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3651-1251
Francesca AlbaniDepartment of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy.
Enrico MarchettiDepartment of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy.
Roberto GattoDepartment of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy.
Giuseppe MarzoDepartment of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy.
Vincenzo QuinziDepartment of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy.
Simona TeccoDental School, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University and IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy.
University of L'Aquila · ITVita-Salute San Raffaele University · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study aimed to investigate salivary levels of Streptococcus mutans (S. mutans) and Lactobacilli, and other salivary indices in subjects wearing clear aligners (CA) in comparison with multibrackets orthodontic appliances (MB). MATERIALS AND

methodsA sample of 80 participants (46 males and 34 females) was included in the study: 40 subjects (aged 20.4±1.7 years) were treated with CA, and 40 (aged 21.3±1.7 years) were treated with MB. Plaque index (PI), salivary flow, buffering power of saliva, and salivary levels of S. mutans and Lactobacilli were evaluated prior to start of orthodontic treatment (t0), after 3 months (t1) and 6 months (t2).

resultsCA patients maintained PI at level 0 over time, while MB participants experienced a statistically significant increasing trend of PI over time. In addition, at t2, 37.5% of MB participants (15 subjects over 40) showed risky salivary levels (CFU/ml>105) of S. mutans (odds ratio = 7.40; 95% C.I. = 1.94-28.25; chi-square = 10.32; p = 0.001) as well as Lactobacilli (odds ratio = 23.40; 95% C.I. = 2.91-188.36; chi-square = 15.31; p = 0.0001).

conclusionsComparing all the data, subjects treated with CA achieved lower salivary microbial colonization after 6 months of treatment compared with MB. Different additional strategies for plaque control and salivary microbial colonization must be triggered considering the type of orthodontic appliance.

Indexed as

Dental Plaque IndexOrthodontic Appliances, FixedOrthodontic Appliances, RemovableColony Count, MicrobialFemaleHumansLactobacillusMaleSalivaStreptococcus mutansYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID32330172
PMCPMC7182227
OpenAlexW3018526437

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.