Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32330150›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Links between the rumen microbiota, methane emissions and feed efficiency of finishing steers offered dietary lipid and nitrate supplementation.

Jenna M Bowen, Paul Cormican, Susan J Lister, Matthew S McCabe, Carol-Anne Duthie, Rainer Roehe, Richard J Dewhurst

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
7.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Composition of the rumen archaeal community of growing camels fed different concentrate levels.International microbiology : the official journal of the Spanish Society for Microbiology · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Comparative anti-methanogenic ability of green algae (Frontiers in veterinary science · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Understanding the Diversity and Roles of the Ruminal Microbiome.Journal of microbiology (Seoul, Korea) · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Jenna M BowenAnimal & Grassland Research and Innovation Centre, Teagasc, Grange, Dunsany, Co. Meath, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0001-7398-8353
Paul CormicanAnimal & Grassland Research and Innovation Centre, Teagasc, Grange, Dunsany, Co. Meath, Ireland.
Susan J ListerIBERS, Aberystwyth University, Aberystwyth, Wales, United Kingdom.
Matthew S McCabeAnimal & Grassland Research and Innovation Centre, Teagasc, Grange, Dunsany, Co. Meath, Ireland.
Carol-Anne DuthieSRUC, Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom.
Rainer RoeheSRUC, Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom.
Richard J DewhurstSRUC, Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom.
Scotland's Rural College · GBTeagasc - The Irish Agriculture and Food Development Authority · IEAberystwyth University · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ruminant methane production is a significant energy loss to the animal and major contributor to global greenhouse gas emissions. However, it also seems necessary for effective rumen function, so studies of anti-methanogenic treatments must also consider implications for feed efficiency. Between-animal variation in feed efficiency represents an alternative approach to reducing overall methane emissions intensity. Here we assess the effects of dietary additives designed to reduce methane emissions on the rumen microbiota, and explore relationships with feed efficiency within dietary treatment groups. Seventy-nine finishing steers were offered one of four diets (a forage/concentrate mixture supplemented with nitrate (NIT), lipid (MDDG) or a combination (COMB) compared to the control (CTL)). Rumen fluid samples were collected at the end of a 56 d feed efficiency measurement period. DNA was extracted, multiplexed 16s rRNA libraries sequenced (Illumina MiSeq) and taxonomic profiles were generated. The effect of dietary treatments and feed efficiency (within treatment groups) was conducted both overall (using non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) and diversity indexes) and for individual taxa. Diet affected overall microbial populations but no overall difference in beta-diversity was observed. The relative abundance of Methanobacteriales (Methanobrevibacter and Methanosphaera) increased in MDDG relative to CTL, whilst VadinCA11 (Methanomassiliicoccales) was decreased. Trimethylamine precursors from rapeseed meal (only present in CTL) probably explain the differences in relative abundance of Methanomassiliicoccales. There were no differences in Shannon indexes between nominal low or high feed efficiency groups (expressed as feed conversion ratio or residual feed intake) within treatment groups. Relationships between the relative abundance of individual taxa and feed efficiency measures were observed, but were not consistent across dietary treatments.

Indexed as

Animal FeedAnimal HusbandryAnimalsCattleDietary FatsDietary SupplementsDNA, BacterialGastrointestinal MicrobiomeGreenhouse EffectGreenhouse GasesMaleMethaneMethanobacteriaceaeMethanobacterialesMethanobrevibacterRNA, Ribosomal, 16SDietary FatsDNA, BacterialGreenhouse GasesMethaneRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID32330150
PMCPMC7182223
OpenAlexW3019629204

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.