Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32329938›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2020

Public acceptability of public health policy to improve population health: A population-based survey.

Catherine A Sharp, Mark A Bellis, Karen Hughes, Kat Ford, Lisa C G Di Lemma

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Public acceptability of public health policy to improve population health: A population-based survey.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Catherine A SharpPublic Health Collaborating Unit, School of Health Sciences, Bangor University, Wrexham, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7311-3933
Mark A BellisPublic Health Collaborating Unit, School of Health Sciences, Bangor University, Wrexham, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6980-1963
Karen HughesPublic Health Collaborating Unit, School of Health Sciences, Bangor University, Wrexham, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8097-3395
Kat FordPublic Health Collaborating Unit, School of Health Sciences, Bangor University, Wrexham, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2984-5838
Lisa C G Di LemmaPolicy and International Health Directorate, World Health Organization Collaborating Centre on Investment for Health and Well-being, Public Health Wales, Wrexham, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9161-1779

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFor public health policies to be effective, it is critical that they are acceptable to the public as acceptance levels impact success rate.

objectiveTo explore public acceptance of public health statements and examine differences in acceptability across socio-demographics, health behaviours (physical activity, diet, binge drinking and smoking), health status and well-being.

methodA cross-sectional survey was conducted with a nationally representative sample (N = 1001) using a random stratified sampling method. Face-to-face interviews were conducted at homes of residents in Wales aged 16+ years. Individuals reported whether they agreed, had no opinion, or disagreed with 12 public health statements.

resultsMore than half of the sample were supportive of 10 out of 12 statements. The three statements with the greatest support (>80% agreement) reflected the importance of: a safe and loving childhood to becoming a healthy adult, schools teaching about health, and healthier foods costing less. Individuals who engaged in unhealthy behaviours were less likely to agree with some of the statements (eg 39.8% of binge drinkers agreed alcohol adverts should be banned compared to 57.6% of those who never binge drink; P < .001).

conclusionsFindings show an appetite for public health policies among the majority of the public. The relationship between supporting policies and engaging in healthy behaviours suggests a feedback loop that is potentially capable of shifting both public opinion and the opportunities for policy intervention. If a nation becomes healthier, this could illicit greater support for stronger policies which could encourage more people to move in a healthier direction.

Indexed as

Alcohol DrinkingPopulation HealthAdultChildCross-Sectional StudiesHealth PolicyHumansPublic Opinionalcoholdietgeneral healthnational surveyphysical activitypolicypublic acceptancepublic healthsmokingwell-being

Identifiers

PMID32329938
PMCPMC7495082

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.