Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32329808›Full record

ReviewHistology and histopathology2020

Intussusceptive angiogenesis and its counterpart intussusceptive lymphangiogenesis.

L Díaz-Flores, R Gutiérrez, S Gayoso, M P García, M González-Gómez, L Díaz-Flores, R Sánchez, J L Carrasco, J F Madrid

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Histology and histopathology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The cellular dance that splits vessels.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  5. Intussusceptive angiogenesis-on-a-chip: Evidence for transluminal vascular bridging by endothelial delamination.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

L Díaz-FloresDepartment of Basic Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain. kayto54@gmail.com.
R GutiérrezDepartment of Basic Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain.
S GayosoDepartment of Basic Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain.
M P GarcíaDepartment of Pathology, Eurofins® Megalab-Hospiten Hospitals, Tenerife, Spain.
M González-GómezDepartment of Basic Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain.
L Díaz-FloresDepartment of Basic Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain.
R SánchezDepartment of Internal Medicine, Dermatology and Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain.
J L CarrascoDepartment of Basic Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain.
J F MadridDepartment of Cell Biology and Histology, School of Medicine, Campus of International Excellence "Campus Mare Nostrum", IMIB-Arrixaca, University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain.
Universidad de La Laguna · ES

Funding

- -
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intussusceptive angiogenesis (IA) is currently considered an important alternative and complementary form of sprouting angiogenesis (SA). Conversely, intussusceptive lymphangiogenesis (IL) is in an initial phase of study. We compare their morphofunctional characteristics, since many can be shared by both processes. To that end, the following aspects are considered: A) The concept of IA and IL as the mechanism by which blood and lymphatic vessels split, expand and remodel through transluminal pillar formations (hallmarks of intussusception). B) Terminology and historical background, with particular reference to the group of Burri, including Djonov and Patan, who initiated and developed the vessel intussusceptive concept in blood vessels. C) Incidence in normal (e.g. in the sinuses of developing lymph nodes) and pathologic conditions, above all in vessel diseases, such as dilated veins in hemorrhoidal disease, intravascular papillary endothelial hyperplasia (IPEH), sinusoidal hemangioma, lobular capillary hemangioma, lymphangiomas/lymphatic malformations and vascular transformation of lymph nodes. D) Differences and complementarity between vessel sprouting and intussusception. E) Characteristics of the cover (endothelial cells) and core (connective tissue components) of pillars and requirements for pillar identification. F) Structures involved in pillar formation, including endothelial contacts of opposite vessel walls, interendothelial bridges, merged adjacent capillaries, vessel loops and spilt pillars. G) Structures resulting from pillars with intussusceptive microvascular growth, arborization, remodeling and segmentation (compartmentalization). H) Influence of intussusception in the morphogenesis of vessel tumors/ pseudotumors; and I) Hemodynamic and molecular control of vessel intussusception, including VEGF, PDGF BB, Hypoxia, Notch, Endoglobin and Nitric oxide.

Indexed as

LymphangiogenesisNeovascularization, PathologicNeovascularization, PhysiologicAngiogenic ProteinsAnimalsBlood VesselsHumansLymphatic VesselsSignal TransductionTerminology as TopicAngiogenic Proteins

Identifiers

PMID32329808
OpenAlexW3018792088

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.