Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32329714›Full record

ArticleeLife2020

Dominant

Stephanie G Hays, Kimberley D Seed

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
7.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 68 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Phage N4 uses a SAR endolysin-holin system for host cell lysis.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  11. Phages use contingency loci as a bet-hedging strategy.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  12. Lineage-specific defence systems of pandemicPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Review
  13. The ecology and evolution of microbial immune systems: a look on the wild vibrio side.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. AJournal of bacteriology · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Stephanie G HaysDepartment of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of California, Berkeley, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-8829-2586
Kimberley D SeedDepartment of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of California, Berkeley, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-0139-1600
Chan Zuckerberg Initiative (United States) · USUniversity of California, Berkeley · US

Funding

Phage resistance and mobile genetic elements in Vibrio choleraeR01AI127652 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI SEED, KIMBERLEY DIANE · 2016 to 2025
$4.6M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI127652
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bacteria, bacteriophages that prey upon them, and mobile genetic elements (MGEs) compete in dynamic environments, evolving strategies to sense the milieu. The first discovered environmental sensing by phages, lysis inhibition, has only been characterized and studied in the limited context of T-even coliphages. Here, we discover lysis inhibition in the etiological agent of the diarrheal disease cholera,

Indexed as

Hepatitis Delta VirusBacteriophagesCholeraCRISPR-Cas SystemsTime FactorsVibrio choleraebacteriophageICP1infectious diseaselysis inhibitionmicrobiologyphagephage satelliteVibrio cholerae

Identifiers

PMID32329714
PMCPMC7182436
OpenAlexW3018354842

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.