ReviewCurrent cancer drug targets2020
The Evolving AML Genomic Landscape: Therapeutic Implications.
Review in Current cancer drug targets, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prognostic significance ofBMJ open · 2023Pooled it
- From pumps to networks: ABC transporters in leukemia resistance and microenvironmental adaptation.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2026Review
- The antitumor effects and apoptotic mechanism of 20(S)-Protopanaxadiol in acute myeloid leukemia.Journal of ginseng research · 2025Article
- AZD-7648, a DNA-PK Inhibitor, Induces DNA Damage, Apoptosis, and Cell Cycle Arrest in Chronic and Acute Myeloid Leukemia Cells.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Genomic and transcriptomic analysis of Korean colorectal cancer patients.Genes & genomics · 2022Article
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Improved understanding of the genomic and molecular landscape of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) has resulted in a significant evolution of our understanding of AML biology and allows refined prognostication for those receiving standard combination chemotherapy induction. This dramatic increase in knowledge preceded, and was somewhat responsible for, at least some of eight new FDA drug approvals for AML. This review discusses the impact of genomics on clinical care of AML patients and highlights newly approved FDA drugs. Despite these recent clinical advances, however, the outcome for most patients diagnosed with AML remains dire. Thus, we describe here some of the challenges identified with treating AML including off-target toxicity, drug transporters, clonal heterogeneity, and adaptive resistance, and some of the most promising opportunities for improved therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.