Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32329374›Full record

ArticleDrug delivery2020

Gefitinib loaded nanostructured lipid carriers: characterization, evaluation and anti-human colon cancer activity

Hafiz A Makeen, Syam Mohan, Mohamed Ahmed Al-Kasim, Ibraheem M Attafi, Rayan A Ahmed, Nabeel Kashan Syed, Muhammad Hadi Sultan, Mohammed Al-Bratty, Hassan A Alhazmi, Mohammed M Safhi and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Drug delivery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hafiz A MakeenDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, Jazan University, Jazan, Saudi Arabia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1078-2478
Syam MohanSubstance Abuse and Toxicology Research Centre, Jazan University, Jazan, Saudi Arabia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2077-1278
Mohamed Ahmed Al-KasimDepartment of Pharmacology, College of Pharmacy, Jazan University, Jazan, Saudi Arabia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9977-5919
Ibraheem M AttafiPoison Control and Medical Forensic Chemistry Centre, General Directorate of Health Affairs, Jazan, Saudi Arabia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5801-8500
Rayan A AhmedDepartment of Pharmacology, College of Pharmacy, Jazan University, Jazan, Saudi Arabia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8675-1264
Nabeel Kashan SyedDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, Jazan University, Jazan, Saudi Arabia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1315-8985
Muhammad Hadi SultanDepartment of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, Jazan University, Jazan, Saudi Arabia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1389-1899
Mohammed Al-BrattyDepartment of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, College of Pharmacy, Jazan University, Jazan, Saudi Arabia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8687-0573
Hassan A AlhazmiSubstance Abuse and Toxicology Research Centre, Jazan University, Jazan, Saudi Arabia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9647-9006
Mohammed M SafhiDepartment of Pharmacology, College of Pharmacy, Jazan University, Jazan, Saudi Arabia.
Raisuddin AliDepartment of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9892-2158
M Intakhab AlamDepartment of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, Jazan University, Jazan, Saudi Arabia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9772-0263
Jazan University · SAKing Saud University · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

NLC containing Gefitinib (NANOGEF) was prepared using stearic acid, sesame oil and surfactants (sodium lauryl sulfate and tween 80). NANOGEFs were evaluated for particle size, polydispersity index (PdI), zeta potential, entrapment efficiency (EE), stability, release studies and cytotoxicity studies (MTT assay). The optimized NANOGEF exhibited particle size of 74.06 ± 9.73 d.nm, PdI of 0.339 ± 0.029 and EE of 99.76 ± 0.015%. The TEM study revealed spherical shape of NANOGEF formulations. The slow and sustained release behavior was exhibited by all NANOGEFs. The effects of surfactants were observed not only on particle size but also on zeta potential, entrapment efficiency, stability and release studies. The MTT assay revealed 4.5 times increase in cytotoxicity for optimized NANOGEF (IC

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsCell DeathColonic NeoplasmsDrug CarriersDrug Delivery SystemsDrug LiberationGefitinibHCT116 CellsHumansLipidsNanostructuresParticle SizeAntineoplastic AgentsDrug CarriersGefitinibLipidscolorectal cancerGefitinibMTT assaynanostructured lipid carrierssodium lauryl sulfateTween 80

Identifiers

PMID32329374
PMCPMC7241461
OpenAlexW3020707943

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.