Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32329370›Full record

ArticleMultivariate behavioral research

The Truth behind the Zeros: A New Approach to Principal Component Analysis of the Neuropsychiatric Inventory.

Kristoffer H Hellton, Jeffrey Cummings, Audun Osland Vik-Mo, Jan Erik Nordrehaug, Dag Aarsland, Geir Selbaek, Lasse Melvaer Giil

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Multivariate behavioral research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Kristoffer H HelltonNorwegian Computing Center, Oslo, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4779-486X
Jeffrey CummingsCleveland Clinic Lou Ruvo Center for Brain Health, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8944-4158
Audun Osland Vik-MoCentre for Age-Related Diseases (SESAM), Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5162-3035
Jan Erik NordrehaugDepartment of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8720-4692
Dag AarslandCentre for Age-Related Diseases (SESAM), Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6314-216X
Geir SelbaekNorwegian National Advisory Unit on Ageing and Health, Vestfold Hospital Trust, Toensberg, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6511-8219
Lasse Melvaer GiilDepartment of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3520-7530
Stavanger University Hospital · NOCleveland Clinic · USHaraldsplass Diakonale Sykehus · NOKing's College London · GBNorwegian Computing Center · NOOslo University Hospital · NO

Funding

Trial-Ready Cohort for Preclinical/Prodromal Alzheimer's DiseaseR01AG053798 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI AISEN, PAUL S., CUMMINGS, JEFFREY L. · 2017 to 2022
$39.4M
Research Education ComponentP30AG072980 · NIA · BANNER HEALTH · PI HEATHER Allyson BIMONTE-NELSON · 2021 to 2026
$24.9M
Renewal of Centers of Biomedical Research Excellence (COBRE) (Phase 2) CNTN - ResubmissionP20GM109025 · NIGMS · CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION · PI Robert J. Fox, Jefferson Kinney · 2015 to 2026
$22.8M
Chronic Traumatic Encephalopathy: Detection, Diagnosis, Course, and Risk FactorsU01NS093334 · NINDS · BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CAMPUS · PI CUMMINGS, JEFFREY L., REIMAN, ERIC MICHAEL · 2016 to 2022
$17.0M
NVEDARC Clinical CoreP20AG068053 · NIA · CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION · PI WINT, DYLAN · 2020 to 2022
$3.3M
NIA NIH HHS P20 AG068053NIA NIH HHS P30 AG072980NIA NIH HHS R01 AG053798NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM109025NINDS NIH HHS U01 NS093334
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Psychiatric syndromes in dementia are often derived from the Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) using principal component analysis (PCA). The validity of this statistical approach can be questioned, since the excessive proportion of zeros and skewness of NPI items may distort the estimated relations between the items. We propose a novel version of PCA, ZIBP-PCA, where a zero-inflated bivariate Poisson (ZIBP) distribution models the pairwise covariance between the NPI items. We compared the performance of the method to classical PCA under zero-inflation using simulations, and in two dementia-cohorts (N = 830, N = 1349). Simulations showed that component loadings from PCA were biased due to zero-inflation, while the loadings of ZIBP-PCA remained unaffected. ZIBP-PCA obtained a simpler component structure of "psychosis," "mood" and "agitation" in both dementia-cohorts, compared to PCA. The principal components from ZIBP-PCA had component loadings as follows: First, the component interpreted as "psychosis" was loaded by the items delusions and hallucinations. Second, the "mood" component was loaded by depression and anxiety. Finally, the "agitation" component was loaded by irritability and aggression. In conclusion, PCA is not equipped to handle zero-inflation. Using the NPI, PCA fails to identify components with a valid interpretation, while ZIBP-PCA estimates simple and interpretable components to characterize the psychopathology of dementia.

Indexed as

DementiaAffectAggressionAnxietyHumansNeuropsychological TestsPrincipal Component Analysisbivariate Poisson distributionMonte Carlo simulationNeuropsychiatric Inventoryprincipal component analysiszero-inflation

Identifiers

PMID32329370
PMCPMC8867488
OpenAlexW3018226047

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.