Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32329020›Full record

ArticleThe patient2020

Heterogeneity in Preferences for Anti-coagulant Use in Atrial Fibrillation: A Latent Class Analysis.

Janine van Til, Catharina Oudshoorn-Groothuis, Marieke Weernink, Clemens von Birgelen

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The patient, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact, top 95% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Janine van TilDepartment of Health Technology and Services Research, Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands. j.a.vantil@utwente.nl.ORCID 0000-0002-5416-5893
Catharina Oudshoorn-GroothuisDepartment of Health Technology and Services Research, Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-4875-5379
Marieke WeerninkDepartment of Health Technology and Services Research, Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-4579-3537
Clemens von BirgelenDepartment of Health Technology and Services Research, Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-5128-2832
University of Twente · NLMedisch Spectrum Twente · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionRecent reviews on patients' preferences towards attributes of oral anti-coagulant therapy have shown that preference for convenience of therapy is heterogeneous. In this study, we used a novel approach-latent class analysis (LCA)-to assess heterogeneity.

methodsWe developed a health preference survey that consisted of 12 discrete choice questions. The following attributes of convenience were included: intake frequency; need for regular coagulation monitoring; diet or drug interactions; relation between medication and food intake; and pill type. Background questions about gender, age, current therapy [i.e., direct-acting oral anti-coagulant (DOAC) or vitamin K antagonist (VKA)], self-reported medication adherence, and pill burden were included. Mixed logit analysis (MLA) and LCA were performed. The scale-adjusted LCA model with two scale classes and four preference classes emerged as the model with the best fit and interpretability.

resultsA total of 508 patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation from five European countries (Germany, Italy, Spain, France, and the UK) were surveyed in August 2017. The most important attributes were need for monitoring (37%) and intake frequency (27%). Patient preferences were significantly influenced by country, gender, and current anti-coagulant therapy. Four different preference classes of patients were identified in the LCA. First, most patients (57%) were in the "no need for regular coagulation monitoring" class. Current DOAC users and patients who were the least adherent to therapy were more likely to prefer no coagulation monitoring. Second, 20% of patients were in the "balanced" class of patients. Current VKA users with moderate adherence were more likely to be in this class. Patients who reported the lowest adherence were most likely in the "once daily, interactions likely" class (16%). Fourth, current VKA users and highly adherent patients were most likely to prefer therapies with a need for regular coagulation monitoring (7%).

conclusionsThis study demonstrated significant preference heterogeneity among patients with atrial fibrillation and linked these preferences to differences in background characteristics. Country of residence and currently prescribed therapy influenced patient preferences in both the MLA and LCA models.

Indexed as

Patient PreferenceAdultAgedAge FactorsAnticoagulantsAtrial FibrillationChoice BehaviorDecision Support TechniquesDrug Administration ScheduleDrug MonitoringEuropeFemaleHumansLatent Class AnalysisMaleMedication AdherenceAnticoagulants

Identifiers

PMID32329020
PMCPMC7340663
OpenAlexW3017465614

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.