Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32328993›Full record

ArticleGeneral thoracic and cardiovascular surgery2020

Postoperative prognostic nutritional index as a prognostic factor after non-small cell lung cancer surgery.

Kazuki Hayasaka, Satoshi Shiono, Katsuyuki Suzuki, Makoto Endoh, Yoshinori Okada

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in General thoracic and cardiovascular surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kazuki HayasakaDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Yamagata Prefectural Central Hospital, 1800, Ooazaaoyagi, Yamagata, 990-2292, Japan.
Satoshi ShionoDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Yamagata Prefectural Central Hospital, 1800, Ooazaaoyagi, Yamagata, 990-2292, Japan. sshiono@ypch.gr.jp.
Katsuyuki SuzukiDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Yamagata Prefectural Central Hospital, 1800, Ooazaaoyagi, Yamagata, 990-2292, Japan.
Makoto EndohDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Yamagata Prefectural Central Hospital, 1800, Ooazaaoyagi, Yamagata, 990-2292, Japan.
Yoshinori OkadaDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Tohoku University Hospital, 4-1 Seiryomachi, Aobaku, Sendai, 980-8575, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe prognostic nutritional index (PNI) is an immunonutrition index. Although preoperative PNI (pre-PNI) has been reported as a prognostic factor for patients with surgically resected non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), it is unclear whether postoperative PNI (post-PNI) and perioperative PNI change is a prognostic factor.

methodsClinicopathological data from 262 consecutive patients who underwent lobectomy for NSCLC were collected. Pre-PNI and post-PNI were calculated within 1 month before surgery and at 1 month after surgery, respectively. We investigated which clinicopathological factors contributed to the post-PNI, the differences in prognosis according to the post-PNI status, and the impact of perioperative PNI change on prognosis.

resultsWe set 50 and 45 as an optimal cutoff value of pre-PNI and post-PNI for OS using a receiver operating characteristic curve. Patients who were older and male and who had lower pre-PNI, larger thoracotomy size, longer operative duration, larger blood loss during surgery, and postoperative pulmonary complications showed significantly lower post-PNI. The 5-year overall survival (OS), lung cancer-specific survival, and recurrence-free survival rates for the high/low post-PNI groups were 87.4%/58.4% (P < 0.001), 92.0%/74.8% (P = 0.001), and 80.5%/55.3% (P < 0.001). respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that the post-PNI was a significant prognostic factor (P < 0.001). We further revealed the equivalent OS with "low pre-PNI and high post-PNI" patients or "high pre-PNI and high post-PNI" patients.

conclusionsPost-PNI status was a significant prognostic factor and perioperative PNI changes could play a significant role in the survival of patients with NSCLC after surgery.

Indexed as

Nutritional StatusNutrition AssessmentAgedCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsPostoperative PeriodPrognosisROC CurveSurvival AnalysisNon-small cell lung cancerOverall survivalPrognostic nutritional indexRecurrence-free survivalSurgery

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.