Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32328965›Full record

ArticleBrazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology]2020

Coagulase-negative staphylococci in outpatient routines: the implications of switching from CLSI to BrCAST/EUCAST guidelines.

Vinícius Pietta Perez, Jéssica Karoliny Baptista Porto Carvalho, Marianne Schrader de Oliveira, Adriana Medianeira Rossato, Caroline Dani, Gertrudes Corção, Pedro Alves d'Azevedo

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology], 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 54% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Antimicrobial Susceptibility ofMicroorganisms · 2025
    Article
  3. Investigating the relationship between extended spectrum β-lactamase producingJournal of environmental health science & engineering · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Vinícius Pietta PerezDepartamento de Fisiologia e Patologia, Universidade Federal da Paraíba, Campus I - Cidade Universitaria, João Pessoa, PB, 58051-900, Brazil. vinicius@ccs.ufpb.br.
Jéssica Karoliny Baptista Porto CarvalhoCurso de Biomedicina, Centro Universitário Metodista IPA, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Marianne Schrader de OliveiraLaboratório Endocrimeta, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Adriana Medianeira RossatoPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Ciências da Saúde, Universidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Caroline DaniCurso de Biomedicina, Centro Universitário Metodista IPA, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Gertrudes CorçãoDepartamento de Microbiologia, Imunologia e Parasitologia, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Pedro Alves d'AzevedoPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Ciências da Saúde, Universidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Centro Universitário Metodista IPA · BRUniversidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre · BRUniversidade Federal da Paraíba · BRUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) are frequently isolated in clinical specimens and are important reservoirs of resistance genes. In 2019, the Brazilian government set the BrCAST/EUCAST (Brazilian Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing) guidelines as the national standard, resulting in changes in the interpretation of CoNS susceptibility tests. From outpatients, disk-diffusion susceptibility of 65 CoNS cultures were evaluated and compared using classification criteria from both CLSI and BrCAST/EUCAST. The isolates were identified using matrix assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight (MALDI-TOF), and the presence of the mecA gene was determined. The most prevalent species were Staphylococcus saprophyticus (32.3%), S. haemolyticus (18.5%), and S. epidermidis (9.2%). Almost perfect agreement was seen between the guidelines, except concerning oxacillin and gentamicin, and the prevalence of multidrug resistant isolates increased with the use of BrCAST/EUCAST. Of all, 15 (23.1%) isolates, mainly S. epidermidis and S. haemolyticus, were positive for the mecA gene, and only three were detected when using CLSI or BrCAST/EUCAST disk-diffusion screening. This, using either guideline, could reveal the difficulty of determining oxacillin resistance. Using warning zones or molecular methods might well be indicated for CoNS. In conclusion, adoption of the BrCAST/EUCAST guidelines will result in certain artificial changes in epidemiological susceptibility profiles, and clinicians and institutions should be aware of the possible implications.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial ProteinsBrazilChildCoagulaseDrug Resistance, BacterialFemaleHumansMaleMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMiddle AgedOutpatientsAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial ProteinsCoagulaseAntimicrobial susceptibility testingBrazilian Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility TestingClinical Laboratory Standards InstituteCoagulase-negative staphylococciEuropean Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility TestingOxacillin resistance

Identifiers

PMID32328965
PMCPMC7455625
OpenAlexW3018935895

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.