Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32328956›Full record

Observational studyInternational journal of clinical pharmacy2020

Appropriateness of oral dosage form modification for aged care residents: a video-recorded observational study.

Aida Sefidani Forough, Esther T L Lau, Kathryn J Steadman, Greg J Kyle, Julie A Y Cichero, Jose Manuel Serrano Santos, Lisa M Nissen

Abstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in International journal of clinical pharmacy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Aida Sefidani ForoughDiscipline of Pharmacy, School of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia. a.sefidaniforough@qut.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7722-7196
Esther T L LauDiscipline of Pharmacy, School of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1892-9996
Kathryn J SteadmanDiscipline of Pharmacy, School of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7357-330X
Greg J KyleDiscipline of Pharmacy, School of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4943-2077
Julie A Y CicheroDiscipline of Pharmacy, School of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7641-0485
Jose Manuel Serrano SantosDiscipline of Pharmacy, School of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9475-326X
Lisa M NissenDiscipline of Pharmacy, School of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5826-4605
Queensland University of Technology · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Dosage forms of oral medications are frequently modified in aged care facilities by crushing/splitting tablets or opening capsules to facilitate medication administration for residents with swallowing difficulties. These practices pose safety concerns including the risk of adverse events resulting from loss of dose during transfer and alteration in the rate of absorption. Objective To identify the incidence, methods, and appropriateness of oral dosage form modification practices in aged care facilities. Setting A purposive sample of four urban and regional aged care facilities in Queensland, Australia. Method The processes of modification of oral dosage forms were observed and video-recorded using an action camera placed on medication trolleys. Each video was then reviewed and the details of the medication modification processes were recorded in a data collection form. The appropriateness of the practices of dosage form modification was evaluated against existing national guideline (Australian Don't Rush to Crush Handbook). Deviations from the instructions in the guideline were considered as inappropriate practice. Main outcome measure Incidence and characteristics of inappropriate modification of oral dosage forms. Results Oral dosage forms were modified in 25.7% of 810 observed medications. The most common methods of dosage form modification included crushing tablets with a manual crushing device (71.6%), cutting/splitting tablets (20.2%), and opening capsules (4.3%). According to the national guideline, 12.5% of the modification instances were inappropriate. Inappropriate practices were commonly associated with the suboptimal methods of medication preparation where medications were unsuitably modified, mixed, spilled, or incompletely dosed. Conclusion The modification of oral dosage forms seems a common practice in aged care facilities in Queensland. However, some of these modifications do not comply with the requirements of good practice according to existing guidelines. Healthcare workers in aged care facilities need to be supported and upskilled with effective training to promote the best and safest practices of ODF modification.

Indexed as

Administration, OralAustraliaCapsulesHealth PersonnelHomes for the AgedHumansIncidenceNursing HomesQueenslandTabletsVideotape RecordingCapsulesTabletsAged careAustraliaMedication administrationMedication preparationOral dosage formsSwallowing difficultiesTablet crushing

Identifiers

PMID32328956
OpenAlexW3018658925

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.