ArticleInternational ophthalmology2020
Chronically retained feathery chestnut-burr spine-related corneal injury: clinical features and outcome.
Article in International ophthalmology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Application of ultrasound biomicroscopy in ocular trauma caused by chestnut-burr spines.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Management of intrascleral chestnut burr spines under ultrasound biomicroscopy guidance.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo establish the clinical features and outcomes of patients with chronically retained, feathery chestnut-burr spine-related corneal injury.
methodsThe data of the patients who presented with chestnut-burr-related corneal injury between 2010 and 2018 were retrospectively evaluated. Nineteen eyes of 19 patients, with chronically retained corneal intrastromal feathery chestnut-burr spines, were included.
resultsThe mean age of the patients (11 male and 8 female) was 29.8 ± 19.9 years. Best-corrected visual acuity was 0.13 ± 0.23 logMAR at initial examination and increased to 0.0 ± 0.0 logMAR at last visit. Chestnut-burr spines were located in the peripheral cornea in 14 eyes (73.7%) and in the central cornea in 5 eyes (26.3%). Localized corneal edema surrounding the chestnut-burr spines were detected in all eyes. No eyes were Seidel positive. Three eyes (15.8%) had low-grade anterior chamber reaction. None of the patients had epithelial ulceration or any sign of infection at initial presentation. In order to control acute localized inflammation, all patients were put on topical steroid (loteprednol etabonate). The mean duration of topical steroid treatment was 3.8 ± 1.8 (range 2-7) months. During the follow-up period, inflammation was controlled and no sign of reinflammation occurred.
conclusionAcute inflammation in intrastromal chestnut-burr spines can be well controlled with easy tapering of topical steroids. However, as the reinflammation possibility cannot be excluded, long-term follow-up of these patients is mandatory.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.