Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32328876›Full record

ReviewMolecular neurobiology2020

Protein Degradome of Spinal Cord Injury: Biomarkers and Potential Therapeutic Targets.

Hadi Abou-El-Hassan, Shadi Bsat, Fares Sukhon, Edwyn Jeremy Assaf, Stefania Mondello, Firas Kobeissy, Kevin K W Wang, Howard L Weiner, Ibrahim Omeis

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular neurobiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Role of matrix metalloproteinase in wound healing.American journal of translational research · 2022
    Review
  6. MicroRNA-218 aggravates HExperimental and therapeutic medicine · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

Hadi Abou-El-HassanAnn Romney Center for Neurologic Diseases, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Shadi BsatDivision of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon.
Fares SukhonFaculty of Medicine, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon.
Edwyn Jeremy AssafFaculty of Medicine, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon.
Stefania MondelloDepartment of Biomedical and Dental Sciences and Morphofunctional Imaging, University of Messina, Messina, Italy.
Firas KobeissyDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, Faculty of Medicine, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.
Kevin K W WangMcKnight Brain Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Howard L WeinerAnn Romney Center for Neurologic Diseases, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Ibrahim OmeisDivision of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon. io04@aub.edu.lb.
American University of Beirut Medical Center · LBAmerican University of Beirut · LBBaylor College of Medicine · USBrigham and Women's Hospital · USHarvard University · USUniversity of Florida · USUniversity of Messina · IT

Funding

Conseil National de la Recherche Scientifique 103486
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Degradomics is a proteomics sub-discipline whose goal is to identify and characterize protease-substrate repertoires. With the aim of deciphering and characterizing key signature breakdown products, degradomics emerged to define encryptic biomarker neoproteins specific to certain disease processes. Remarkable improvements in structural and analytical experimental methodologies as evident in research investigating cellular behavior in neuroscience and cancer have allowed the identification of specific degradomes, increasing our knowledge about proteases and their regulators and substrates along with their implications in health and disease. A physiologic balance between protein synthesis and degradation is sought with the activation of proteolytic enzymes such as calpains, caspases, cathepsins, and matrix metalloproteinases. Proteolysis is essential for development, growth, and regeneration; however, inappropriate and uncontrolled activation of the proteolytic system renders the diseased tissue susceptible to further neurotoxic processes. In this article, we aim to review the protease-substrate repertoires as well as emerging therapeutic interventions in spinal cord injury at the degradomic level. Several protease substrates and their breakdown products, essential for the neuronal structural integrity and functional capacity, have been characterized in neurotrauma including cytoskeletal proteins, neuronal extracellular matrix glycoproteins, cell junction proteins, and ion channels. Therefore, targeting exaggerated protease activity provides a potentially effective therapeutic approach in the management of protease-mediated neurotoxicity in reducing the extent of damage secondary to spinal cord injury.

Indexed as

ProteolysisAnimalsBiomarkersHumansMass SpectrometryNeuronsProtein Processing, Post-TranslationalProteomeProteomicsSpinal Cord InjuriesBiomarkersProteomeBiomarkersBreakdownDegradomicsProteaseSpinal cord injury

Identifiers

PMID32328876
OpenAlexW3020100555

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.