Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32328844›Full record

ArticleInvestigational new drugs2020

A phase I study of the VEGFR kinase inhibitor vatalanib in combination with the mTOR inhibitor, everolimus, in patients with advanced solid tumors.

Mojun Zhu, Julian R Molina, Grace K Dy, Gary A Croghan, Yingwei Qi, James Glockner, Lorelei J Hanson, Michelle M Roos, Angelina D Tan, Alex A Adjei

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase I
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Investigational new drugs, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Autophagy Modulators in Cancer Therapy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Mojun ZhuMayo Clinic, 200 First St. SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Julian R MolinaMayo Clinic, 200 First St. SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Grace K DyRoswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY, 14263, USA.
Gary A CroghanMayo Clinic, 200 First St. SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Yingwei QiDignity Health Medical Foundation, San Francisco, CA, 94107, USA.
James GlocknerMayo Clinic, 200 First St. SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Lorelei J HansonMayo Clinic, 200 First St. SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Michelle M RoosMayo Clinic, 200 First St. SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Angelina D TanMayo Clinic, 200 First St. SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Alex A AdjeiMayo Clinic, 200 First St. SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA. adjei.alex@mayo.edu.
Mayo Clinic · USDignity Health · USRoswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center · US

Funding

Women's Cancer ProgramP30CA015083 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI Felicity Enders · 1985 to 2026
$151.3M
PHASE I CLINICAL TRIALS OF ANTICANCER AGENTSU01CA069912 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI ERLICHMAN, CHARLES · 1995 to 2013
$10.1M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA015083NCI NIH HHS U01 CA069912
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose Combining small-molecule inhibitors of different targets was shown to be synergistic in preclinical studies. Testing this concept in clinical trials is, however, daunting due to challenges in toxicity management and efficacy assessment. This study attempted to evaluate the safety and efficacy of vatalanib plus everolimus in patients with advanced solid tumors and explore the utility of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) studies as a predictive biomarker. Patients and Methods This single-center, phase I trial containing 70 evaluable patients consisted of a dose escalation proportion based on the traditional "3 + 3" design (cohort IA and IB) and a dose expansion proportion (cohort IIA and IIB). Toxicity was evaluated using the Common Terminology Criteria of Adverse Events. Antitumor activity was assessed using the Modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. Results The maximum tolerated doses were determined to be vatalanib 1250 mg once daily or 750 mg twice daily in combination with everolimus 10 mg once daily. No treatment-related death occurred. The most common toxicities were hypertriglyceridemia, hypercholesterolemia, fatigue, vomiting, nausea and diarrhea. There was no complete response. Nine patients (12.9%) had partial response (PR) and 41 (58.6%) had stable disease (SD). Significant antitumor activity was observed in neuroendocrine tumors with a disease-control rate (PR + SD) of 66.7% and other tumor types including renal cancer, melanoma, and non-small-cell lung cancer. Conclusions The combination of vatalanib and everolimus demonstrated reasonable toxicity and clinical activity. Future studies combining targeted therapies and incorporating biomarker analysis are warranted based on this phase I trial.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic AgentsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsEverolimusFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsPhthalazinesProtein Kinase InhibitorsPyridinesReceptors, Vascular Endothelial Growth FactorTOR Serine-Threonine KinasesAntineoplastic AgentsEverolimusMTOR protein, humanPhthalazinesProtein Kinase InhibitorsPyridinesReceptors, Vascular Endothelial Growth FactorTOR Serine-Threonine KinasesvatalanibEverolimusPhase ITargeted therapyVatalanib

Identifiers

PMID32328844
OpenAlexW3020583382

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.