Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32328534›Full record

ArticleHuman reproduction open2020

Real-life insights on menstrual cycles and ovulation using big data.

I Soumpasis, B Grace, S Johnson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human reproduction open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The effects of oral contraceptives on resting autonomic function and the autonomic response to physiological stressors: a systematic review.Clinical autonomic research : official journal of the Clinical Autonomic Research Society · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Timed intercourse for couples trying to conceive.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023
    Pooled it
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Are there sex differences in the variability of fasting metabolism?Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985) · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

I SoumpasisClinical Research Department, SPD Swiss Precision Diagnostics Development Company Limited, Bedford, MK44 3UP, UK.
B GraceClinical Research Department, SPD Swiss Precision Diagnostics Development Company Limited, Bedford, MK44 3UP, UK.
S JohnsonClinical Research Department, SPD Swiss Precision Diagnostics Development Company Limited, Bedford, MK44 3UP, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3371-7246

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

study questionWhat variations underlie the menstrual cycle length and ovulation day of women trying to conceive? SUMMARY ANSWER: Big data from a connected ovulation test revealed the extent of variation in menstrual cycle length and ovulation day in women trying to conceive. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Timing intercourse to coincide with the fertile period of a woman maximises the chances of conception. The day of ovulation varies on an inter- and intra-individual level. STUDY DESIGN SIZE DURATION: A total of 32 595 women who had purchased a connected ovulation test system contributed 75 981 cycles for analysis. Day of ovulation was determined from the fertility test results. The connected home ovulation test system enables users to identify their fertile phase. The app benefits users by enabling them to understand their personal fertility information. During each menstrual cycle, users input their perceived cycle length into an accessory application, and data on hormone levels from the tests are uploaded to the application and stored in an anonymised cloud database. This study compared users' perceived cycle characteristics with actual cycle characteristics. The perceived and actual cycle length information was analysed to provide population ranges. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS SETTING

methodsThis study analysed data from the at-home use of a commercially available connected home ovulation test by women across the USA and UK. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Overall, 25.3% of users selected a 28-day cycle as their perceived cycle length; however, only 12.4% of users actually had a 28-day cycle. Most women (87%) had actual menstrual cycle lengths between 23 and 35 days, with a normal distribution centred on day 28, and over half of the users (52%) had cycles that varied by 5 days or more. There was a 10-day spread of observed ovulation days for a 28-day cycle, with the most common day of ovulation being Day 15. Similar variation was observed for all cycle lengths examined. For users who conducted a test on every day requested by the app, a luteinising hormone (LH) surge was detected in 97.9% of cycles. LIMITATIONS REASONS FOR CAUTION: Data were from a self-selected population of women who were prepared to purchase a commercially available product to aid conception and so may not fully represent the wider population. No corresponding demographic data were collected with the cycle information. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE

findingsUsing big data has provided more personalised insights into women's fertility; this could enable women trying to conceive to better time intercourse, increasing the likelihood of conception. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: The study was funded by SPD Development Company Ltd (Bedford, UK), a fully owned subsidiary of SPD Swiss Precision Diagnostics GmbH (Geneva, Switzerland). I.S., B.G. and S.J. are employees of the SPD Development Company Ltd.

Indexed as

connected ovulation test systemsmenstrual cyclemenstrual cycle lengthmenstrual cycle variabilityovulation

Identifiers

PMID32328534
PMCPMC7164578
OpenAlexW3016770067

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.