ArticleOpen forum infectious diseases2020
Electronic Consults for Infectious Diseases in a United States Multisite Academic Health System.
Article in Open forum infectious diseases, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- From Gut Microbiomes to Infectious Pathogens: Neurological Disease Game Changers.Molecular neurobiology · 2025Review
- Speed, Spectrum, and Satisfaction: Assessment of an Infectious Diseases eConsult Program.Open forum infectious diseases · 2024Article
- Review
- Implementation of Outpatient Infectious Diseases E-Consults at a Safety Net Healthcare System.Open forum infectious diseases · 2022Article
- Article
- Opportunities and challenges in improving antimicrobial use during the era of telehealth expansion: A narrative review.Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE · 2021Review
- Automatic ID Consultation for Inpatients With COVID-19: Point, Counterpoint, and a Single-Center Experience.Open forum infectious diseases · 2020Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We launched Infectious Disease electronic consultations (eConsults) in 2018. During the first 15.5 months, primary care practitioners submitted 328 eConsults; the most frequent reasons were a positive culture or polymerase chain reaction (PCR) result, syphilis, and latent tuberculosis. Practitioners commonly requested advice on antimicrobial choice, clinical evaluation, and indications for treatment. Internal phone consultations decreased after eConsult implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.