ArticleCureus2020
The Effect of Red Cell Distribution Width Admission Value on the Outcome of Patients with First-ever ST-elevation Myocardial Infarction in Basrah.
Article in Cureus, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Red cell distribution width-to-albumin ratio and hypertension risk: age-specific threshold effects identified in the 2017-2020 NHANES U.S. Adult population.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2025Article
- Red Cell Distribution Width as a Marker of Disease Severity and In-hospital Mortality in Patients with ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Red cell distribution width (RDW) reflects the volumetric heterogeneity of red blood cells (RBCs) and has proven to be a prognostic predictor for cardiovascular (CV) morbidity and mortality in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). The study aims to evaluate the effect of the RDW admission value on the outcome of patients with STEMI. Materials and methods This is a cross-sectional observational study on (207) patients with first-ever STEMI, grouped according to their baseline RDW and thrombolysis eligibility into two groups. We calculated the in-hospital Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) score within 48 hours of presentation. Results The study demonstrated the impact of RDW on the primary STEMI outcomes (left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF%), ST-resolution, arrhythmias, and cardiovascular mortality risk). It was nearly a gender-matched study, with a mean RDW of 14.20±1.86%. RDW>14% and age≥65 years were the strongest statistically significant independent predictors of STEMI outcome with LVEF % < 45%, ST-resolution, and CV mortality regardless of thrombolysis. The thrombolysis offers a logical significant negative relation with CV mortality. At the same time, hypertension, diabetes mellitus (DM), and smoking may cause an additional mortality burden, especially in elderly patients with high RDW who are not eligible for thrombolysis. There was a significant association between high GRACE to high RDW, with excellent specificity and sensitivity in predicting CV outcome. Conclusion The RDW is a simple to acquire index, with a good prognostic prediction of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) and CV mortality in the STEMI patients. It is excellent in predicting STEMI outcomes, especially the response to thrombolysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.