ArticleComputational and mathematical methods in medicine2020
ACNNT3: Attention-CNN Framework for Prediction of Sequence-Based Bacterial Type III Secreted Effectors.
Article in Computational and mathematical methods in medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- PLM-effector: unleashing the potential of protein language models for bacterial secreted protein prediction.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- DeepT3 2.0: improving type III secreted effector predictions by an integrative deep learning framework.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2021Article
- Machine learning-enabled predictive modeling to precisely identify the antimicrobial peptides.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2021Article
- Information extraction for prognostic stage prediction from breast cancer medical records using NLP and ML.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2021Article
- Classification of Homo sapiens gene behavior using linear discriminant analysis fused with minimum entropy mapping.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2021Article
- iT3SE-PX: Identification of Bacterial Type III Secreted Effectors Using PSSM Profiles and XGBoost Feature Selection.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2021Article
- DeepT3_4: A Hybrid Deep Neural Network Model for the Distinction Between Bacterial Type III and IV Secreted Effectors.Frontiers in microbiology · 2021Article
- Self-evoluting framework of deep convolutional neural network for multilocus protein subcellular localization.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The type III secretion system (T3SS) is a special protein delivery system in Gram-negative bacteria which delivers T3SS-secreted effectors (T3SEs) to host cells causing pathological changes. Numerous experiments have verified that T3SEs play important roles in many biological activities and in host-pathogen interactions. Accurate identification of T3SEs is therefore essential to help understand the pathogenic mechanism of bacteria; however, many existing biological experimental methods are time-consuming and expensive. New deep-learning methods have recently been successfully applied to T3SE recognition, but improving the recognition accuracy of T3SEs is still a challenge. In this study, we developed a new deep-learning framework, ACNNT3, based on the attention mechanism. We converted 100 residues of the N-terminal of the protein sequence into a fusion feature vector of protein primary structure information (one-hot encoding) and position-specific scoring matrix (PSSM) which are used as the feature input of the network model. We then embedded the attention layer into CNN to learn the characteristic preferences of type III effector proteins, which can accurately classify any protein directly as either T3SEs or non-T3SEs. We found that the introduction of new protein features can improve the recognition accuracy of the model. Our method combines the advantages of CNN and the attention mechanism and is superior in many indicators when compared to other popular methods. Using the common independent dataset, our method is more accurate than the previous method, showing an improvement of 4.1-20.0%.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.