Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32328146›Full record

ArticleEvidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM2020

Anthraquinones Extract from

Rui-Rong Chen, Juan Liu, Zhe Chen, Wen-Jun Cai, Xiu-Fen Li, Chuan-Li Lu

Open access · hybridAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Evaluation of Hepatoprotective Activity ofAdvances in pharmacological and pharmaceutical sciences · 2021
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Rui-Rong ChenGuangdong Key Lab of Sugarcane Improvement & Biorefinery, Guangdong Bioengineering Institute (Guangzhou Sugarcane Industry Research Institute), Guangdong Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510316, China.
Juan LiuGuangdong Key Lab of Sugarcane Improvement & Biorefinery, Guangdong Bioengineering Institute (Guangzhou Sugarcane Industry Research Institute), Guangdong Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510316, China.
Zhe ChenCollege of Food Science and Technology, Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming 650201, China.
Wen-Jun CaiCollege of Food Science and Technology, Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming 650201, China.
Xiu-Fen LiCollege of Food Science and Technology, Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming 650201, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4539-1028
Chuan-Li LuGuangdong Key Lab of Sugarcane Improvement & Biorefinery, Guangdong Bioengineering Institute (Guangzhou Sugarcane Industry Research Institute), Guangdong Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510316, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5563-4436
Yunnan Agricultural University · CNGuangdong Academy of Sciences · CNChinese Academy of Sciences · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In Southwestern China, the root of

Identifiers

PMID32328146
PMCPMC7149410
OpenAlexW3014901243

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.